On Saturday 08 January 2005 01:53 pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bruce> The problem is is that XXX *DOES* actually appear in an
> AM_CONDITIONAL.
>
> But these macros are not evaluated because of your quoting, so
> effectively XXX is
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> The problem is is that XXX *DOES* actually appear in an AM_CONDITIONAL.
But these macros are not evaluated because of your quoting, so
effectively XXX is not defined at all.
[...]
Bruce> [`some-shell-script-test`
Bruce> if test $? -
RTFM:
The shell CONDITION (suitable for use in a shell `if' statement)
is evaluated when `configure' is run. Note that you must arrange
for _every_ `AM_CONDITIONAL' to be invoked every time `configure'
is run - if `AM_CONDITIONAL' is run conditionally (e.g., in a
shell `i
The problem is is that XXX *DOES* actually appear in an AM_CONDITIONAL.
Right in the "configure.ac" file, actually. So, obviously, it is having some
problem actually finding the AM_CONDITIONAL not not being clear enough
for me to fix the issue. Is it necessary to macroize the text and only use
th
