Re: Choose SET_MAKE correctly when there is no `make'

2005-01-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2005-01-04 Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * lib/autoconf/programs.m4 (AC_PROG_MAKE_SET): If the Make program does > not seem to work, assume it does set $(MAKE). > * doc/autoconf.texi (AC_PROG_MAKE_SET): Update. Thanks; I installed

Re: Choose SET_MAKE correctly when there is no `make'

2005-01-04 Thread Noah Misch
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:49:08AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2005-01-04 Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * lib/autoconf/programs.m4 (AC_PROG_MAKE_SET): If the Make program does > > not seem to work, assume it does set $(MAKE). Make `M

Re: Choose SET_MAKE correctly when there is no `make'

2005-01-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2005-01-04 Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * lib/autoconf/programs.m4 (AC_PROG_MAKE_SET): If the Make program does > not seem to work, assume it does set $(MAKE). Make `MAKE' precious. > * doc/autoconf.texi (AC_PROG_MAKE_SET): Update

Re: configure-generated *.in's

2005-01-04 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 03:09:21PM -0800, J.T. Conklin wrote: >> While AC_CONFIG_PKGCONFIG_IN() is very appealing, writing a script >> that takes similar arguments and generates a *.pc.in file that can > > if

Choose SET_MAKE correctly when there is no `make'

2005-01-04 Thread Noah Misch
I tried configuring Autoconf on a system with `gmake' but no `make'. Automake requires AC_PROG_SET_MAKE, which decided that `make' did not predefine $(MAKE). It substituted `MAKE=make' into @SET_MAKE@ in the Makefile as a workaround, and running `gmake' then failed for lack a `make'. As an immedi