Re: "Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined"

2004-12-06 Thread Bruce Korb
On Monday 06 December 2004 01:18 pm, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:57:50PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: > > Subject: 29, > > 900 English pages for "Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined" > > google is exaggerating, of course. Of course it is. That doesn't mean

"Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined"

2004-12-06 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi, On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:57:50PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: > Subject: 29, > 900 English pages for "Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined" google is exaggerating, of course. When you enter "Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined" with the quotes, you only get 7

29, 900 English pages for "Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined"

2004-12-06 Thread Bruce Korb
Maybe someone can figure out a better error message, please? For those that found *this* message because of the subject line: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2004-07/msg00083.html > Stephan> although AC_PROG_LIBTOOL _is_ present in configure.ac. > > Therefore it means AC_PROG_L

Re: CXXLINK in generated Makefiles

2004-12-06 Thread Dale E. Martin
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:55:23AM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Dale> AC_SUBST(CXX) > > This is superfluous if you already call AC_PROG_CXX. OK, I've wondered about that. > Dale> AC_SUBST(CXXLINK) > > This will override the Automake definition of this variable with > the configure de

Re: Error because README is missing

2004-12-06 Thread Paul Smith
%% Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I suppose I could tell those folks to run the config.status step by >> hand, but I'd really like to get this built through the configure >> script. Ideas? rw> dnl ... rw> AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile]) rw> AC_OUTPUT rw> touch foo.in

Re: Error because README is missing

2004-12-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:03:27AM CET: > Hello, > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:28:17AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > AC_OUTPUT > > touch foo.in > > ./config.status --file foo > > why the ``touch''? (./config.status doesn't check the timestamps.) Oh, that was just copy-

Re: Error because README is missing

2004-12-06 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:28:17AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > AC_OUTPUT > touch foo.in > ./config.status --file foo why the ``touch''? (./config.status doesn't check the timestamps.) Have a nice day, Stepan Kasal

Re: Error because README is missing

2004-12-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Paul Smith wrote on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:25:56PM CET: > %% Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ad> Finally, note that you are allowed to ask config.status to perform > ad> substitutions on files it doesn't know[1]. In your case, I'm unsure > ad> binding the instantiation to c

Re: Relative path in CPPFLAGS and distcheck

2004-12-06 Thread Robert Lowe
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: [Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert" == Robert Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> Hi! Robert> I have a set of common headers files in includes/ and the following Robert> line in configure.ac: Robert> AC_SUBST(CPPFLAGS,[-I../includes]) Should be AC_S

Re: Error because README is missing

2004-12-06 Thread Paul Smith
%% Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ad> Finally, note that you are allowed to ask config.status to perform ad> substitutions on files it doesn't know[1]. In your case, I'm unsure ad> binding the instantiation to configure instead of make is right. Doh! I thought this would be the