>>> "Martin" == Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Martin> And somebody should take a look at other compilers, too.
Speaking of these... does anybody know about some C compiler
that compiles *.s files and does not support both `-c -o' at the
same time? In other words, the `compile'
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 17:06, Martin Waitz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on a project which uses assembler files which get
>> preprocessed by the C preprocessor (.S files).
>> automake does not yet keep track of dependencies of
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Martin Waitz wrote:
hi :)
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:50:19AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
How well does this patch work for filesystems which do not preserve
case in file names?
I guess the patch doesn't change the situation here.
Mixed case filenames on such filesystems have
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 09:58, Martin Waitz wrote:
> But perhaps you are right and we should not separate handling of .s and .S.
I strongly concur.
*.s and *.S are different beasts.
Filesystems and systems which can not distinguish them, have lost.
But this is not an automake problem, this is desi
hi :)
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:50:19AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> How well does this patch work for filesystems which do not preserve
> case in file names?
I guess the patch doesn't change the situation here.
Mixed case filenames on such filesystems have always been a problem.
This patch
