On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 06:52, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Older versions of automake allowed arbitrary library names.
>
> noinst_LIBRARIES = foo.a
>
> Recent versions of automake now complain about this naming.
Recent? Well, AFAICT this (mal-) feature is in automake for years.
I wish it had never been i
Dale E Martin wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Makefile.am:2: `foo.a' is not a standard library name
>
> Does this work?
> foo_a_LDFLAGS=-module
No. I get the same result. I am glad it did not work. It would have
been just too strange. Thanks for making the suggestion just the
same.
Bob
An email message that you sent has been delivered
with one or more attachments altered or removed per
security policy.
The email header contained the following:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question
The email has this following problem:
The email c
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 10:52:54PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Older versions of automake allowed arbitrary library names.
>
> noinst_LIBRARIES = foo.a
>
> Recent versions of automake now complain about this naming.
>
> Makefile.am:2: `foo.a' is not a standard library name
>
> I would normal
DR. CHARLES ELA
CREDIT AND FOREIGN DEPARTMENT
CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA (C.B.N)
MARINA- BRANCH, LAGOS.
ATTN: PRESIDENT/M.D,
My name is DR. Charles Ela the manager, credit and foreign bills of African
Development Bank. I am writing in respect of a foreign customer of my bank with
account number
Dear Open Source developer
I am doing a research project on "Fun and Software Development" in which I
kindly invite you to participate.
You will find the online survey under http://fasd.ethz.ch/qgs/. The
questionnaire consists of 53 questions and you will need about 15 minutes to
complete it.
Wit
