Hello,
I just moved to the autotools and I'm facing a problem
I cannot deal with; I've searched the autoconf and
automake manuals but in vain.
I've got some existing code to port to the autotools
system.
The code should be divided into three packages and a
fourth should consist of the sum of the o
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.8.3.
This is a bug fix release. The list of bug fixes is appended below.
You can find the new release here:
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.8.3.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.8.3.tar.gz.sig
ftp://ftp.gnu
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Thus, if I'm right that Automake doesn't know which directories
> > the package owns, it should should err on the side of caution: it
> > should *not* try to delete any empty directories at uninstall
> > time. Neither should Automake try to guess --
Kelley Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sorry if this is a RTFM, but I can't find it.
The release notes for automake 1.8, mention that it changes the
defaults to go back to building the .info files in the source
directory since that is the GNU coding standards.
What do I have to p
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:24:21AM -0500, Hans Deragon wrote:
> Mmm... Posted this message two days ago but have yet to receive any
> answer.
Not too long a time, I'd think.
> I believe my question is pretty basic, so anybody care to give me
> an answer? Surely someone with years of experien
Hi,
[Info files being built in source dir]
> FWIW, having a read only source directory is our goal.
When the source dir is readonly, noone can change the texinfo files. If
noone can change the texinfo files, there is no need to rebuild the info
files, so it doesn't matter that they're in a reado
