Linking with non-libtool libraries

2004-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I have a fairly large project that consists of a number of executables and shared libraries, all built with autoconf/automake/libtool. Most of the executables also depend on thirdparty shared libraries that are either not built with libtool, or they were, in a separate tree and then cop

Re: Re: Good

2004-02-18 Thread Rachelle Rivas
If the message is not loading try this cornelia belshazzar eloquent donaldson , delight chadwick . articulatory twa assurance , arid balletic . centrex preponderant allen, effeminate fiasco . blatant , chairmen calvin , madcap . pale . charta , clannish fructose , theologian . sunshade

BUILT_SOURCES problem

2004-02-18 Thread Harlan Stenn
I see that the "install" target now depends on BUILT_SOURCES. This is Good. I have a different problem. I have a pre-built dynamic library that gets checked in to the tree. Don't ask, it's really a feature. So I have a Makefile.am that contains: BUILT_SOURCES= setup.libs GEN_LIBS= gen.

<< Llama a los precios mas Baratos del Mercado desde TU Movil >>--- Valido en Todo el Mundo

2004-02-18 Thread 1Cellnet
Title: 1CellNet.com.es "Empieza una Nueva Vida para TU Movil"

Re: html texinfo install?

2004-02-18 Thread Bruce Korb
Eric Siegerman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:02:45PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote: > > If, as in Bruce's proposal, they explicitly say "I want HTML", when > > there's no HTML in the distribution, that's one thing. Making it happen > > when they say "configure && make install", quite another. >

Re: html texinfo install?

2004-02-18 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 08:26, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > [Eric I don't think you really meant to conceal this from Karl > and Patrice, so I've added the Cc: back. Please be careful not > to drop it.] > > >>> "Eric" == Eric Siegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Eric> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 a