On Dec 3, 2003, Mohan Embar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to see how much faster the libgcj build would go if I took
> libtool out of the picture for some of the pieces.
I'm not all that surprised your C program is much faster that the
shell script. For starters, it fails to support all
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, John Darrington wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:38:52PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Does src1/foo.c exist?
>
> Yes.
>
> Are you using Automake 1.7.9?
>
> No. I was using 1.7.6 and it seemed that atl_SOURCES=src1/foo.c
> works fine with this version. So presu
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:38:52PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Does src1/foo.c exist?
Yes.
Are you using Automake 1.7.9?
No. I was using 1.7.6 and it seemed that atl_SOURCES=src1/foo.c
works fine with this version. So presumably the underscore thing was
introduced between 1.
It would be useful if Automake supported a set of options (e.g.
LDFLAGS) which are applied only when building libraries or when
building programs. It is excessively painful to have to add
per-target _LDFLAGS options. Perhaps there should be both 'LT' and
non-'LT' macro versions.
Certainly this c
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2003-11/msg00075.html
fixes the longstading (dates back to the beginning of the CVS
repository) failure to use the third argument of AU_DEFUN.
Maybe given the problems with 2.58 it would be good to distribute
Automake 1.8 and Autoconf 2.60 toget
