RFE: Restricting a package to a particular automake version

2003-11-25 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, With the release of automake-1.8 ahead, a request for enhancement: automake-1.8 probably will be incompatible to automake-1.7 Up to now I have encountered 2 incompatiblities: * The generating info files in $srcdir issue. * aclocal complaining about underquoting in custom macros. Therefore t

Re: AM_CPPFLAGS vs INCLUDES

2003-11-25 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: My point was not entirely that the documentation was wrong. It is an extremely useful capability to be able to define a common base set of CPPFLAGS and then use per-target CPPFLAGS to extend these (equivalent to +=). Otherwise the Makefile.am has to be very messy and large

'ccache gcc' as compiler with libtool

2003-11-25 Thread Vincent Caron
Hello, I'm running automake 1.7.9 as packaged in Sid, and having trouble using 'cache gcc' as compiler. I get this error : /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link ccache g++ -Wall [...] libtool: link: unable to infer tagged configuration libtool: link: specify a tag with `--tag' As far as I could se

Non-recursive make & maintenance issue

2003-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
The most non-productive aspect I have found when using Automake to build projects in subdirectories is that it is very tedious to translate '/'s (and other special characters) in paths and filenames to '_' when defining target parameters. The situation becomes worse with non-recursive approaches th

Automake 1.7f uploaded (third beta for Automake 1.8)

2003-11-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi people, This is the third beta release of the next version of Automake (1.8). Please try it and help us fixing as much bug as possible. If no important bug are reported against this version, I think it is ready to be called 1.8. I've appended the changes since 1.7d, as well as the updated full

Re: AM_CPPFLAGS vs INCLUDES

2003-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bob> The Automake documentation claims that 'INCLUDES' is the > Bob> equivalent of 'AM_CPPFLAGS'. However, I find that this is > Bob> not the case at all. If AM_CPPFLAGS is used, th

Adresim Deðiþti

2003-11-25 Thread Karavala DünyaTuru /TourByCaravan
Yeni adresim [EMAIL PROTECTED] oldu. Lutfen bundan sonra maillerinizi bu adrese gönderiniz. Yahoo'daki evileye adresi bana bilgi verilmeksizin ka- patıldı. Bu nedenle o adrese göndermiş olduğunuz iletiler bana ulaşamadı. Bilginize GezCin

Re: AM_CPPFLAGS vs INCLUDES

2003-11-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bob> The Automake documentation claims that 'INCLUDES' is the Bob> equivalent of 'AM_CPPFLAGS'. However, I find that this is Bob> not the case at all. If AM_CPPFLAGS is used, then any Bob> per-target CPPFLAGS option completely override

Re: automake 1.7d feedback

2003-11-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Bruno> However, there is an important change in behaviour that Bruno> IMO should be mentioned in the NEWS file (or maybe even Bruno> undone): While it was possible to add dependencies to Bruno> automake targets in automake-1.7.x, su

how does AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([options]) work?

2003-11-25 Thread Marty Leisner
I was under the impression I can pass command line options with this syntax... Options like foreign work but verbose doesn't. marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't confuse education with schooling. Milton Friedman to Yogi Berra

Re: Adding --tag=CXX

2003-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
As an addendum to this topic, it used to be easy to override how Automake uses libtool, but this is no longer the case. For example, I could insert this in Makefile.am to override the default: LTCOMPILE = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=compile --tag=CC $(CC) $(DEFS) \ $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $

Adding --tag=CXX

2003-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
In a build environment I am creating using Automake 1.7.9 & CVS libtool, GCC (gcc & g++) are used as the normal compiler. However, sometimes developers want to substitute 'insure' as the compiler in order to do memory leak checking. My understanding is that 'insure' runs the tested gcc or g++ und

Soliciting For Business Venture and Partnership.

2003-11-25 Thread Mr . Smith Ulu
From: Mr. Smith Ulu. Telephone: 27-73-225-54-25 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Greetings, I am a financial consultant based in port Elizabeth, South Africa I have a client (a widow) she has USDM45, 000,000 with a private equity investment trust company for safekeeping. And she is w