New gnu dist procedures

2003-11-24 Thread John Darrington
With the new ftp upload procedures, shouldn't the automake targets be changed appropriately? In particular: The dist target should generate the package.tar.gz.asc file and the dist-check target should verify that this signature is indeed valid. J' -- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerp

Business Relationship

2003-11-24 Thread all_well
Dear, I hope this letter will not come to you as a surprise; it was borne out of my desire to share a business relation ship with you. My Name is Allwell Koffi Nkwamme, Ghana National and an Accountant in Oil refinery in Durra Iraq. Before U.S.strike Iraqi, few days to the expiration of the 48 hour

Re: linewrap problem?

2003-11-24 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> ntp's util/Makefile.am has a line that looked something like: Harlan> bin_PROGRAMS = @A@ @B@ @C@ Harlan> and was almost 80 characters long. Harlan> automake-1.7.7 (and 1.7.8, apparently) have a problem Harlan> in that they wra

LUCKY WINNERS NOTIFICATION.

2003-11-24 Thread luckyywiners
FROM: THE PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT LOTERIA LA PRIMITIVA ,MADRID - ESPAÑA. Congratulations Category A prize winner! You have been selected as one of two winners of the Worldwide loteria la primitiva Madrid - España computer ballot draws and thus will be a privileged recipient of the grand draw prize

Re: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an older version of automake

2003-11-24 Thread Tom Tromey
> ">" == Piyush Kumar Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> configure.in:12: old Automake version. You should recreate aclocal.m4 >> configure.in:12: with aclocal and run automake again. >> I am using RHL8.0. I also tried upgrading automake to 1.7.9 and >> autoconf to 2.57. It doesn't work. It

Re: automake 1.7d feedback

2003-11-24 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bh> automake-1.7d is fine for me: I cannot find anything wrong with it. bh> However, there is an important change in behaviour that IMO should bh> be mentioned in the NEWS file (or maybe even undone): While it was bh> possible to add dependencie

automake 1.7d feedback

2003-11-24 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Alexandre et al., automake-1.7d is fine for me: I cannot find anything wrong with it. However, there is an important change in behaviour that IMO should be mentioned in the NEWS file (or maybe even undone): While it was possible to add dependencies to automake targets in automake-1.7.x, such d

Soliciting For Business Venture and Partnership.

2003-11-24 Thread smithulu
From: Mr. Smith Ulu. Telephone: 27-73-225-54-25 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Greetings, I am a financial consultant based in port Elizabeth, South Africa I have a client (a widow) she has USDM45, 000,000 with a private equity investment trust company for safekeeping. And she is

AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an older version of automake

2003-11-24 Thread Piyush Kumar Garg
Hi, I get the following error during installation of a network management software gxsnmp. configure.in:12: your implementation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an configure.in:12: old Automake version. You should recreate aclocal.m4 configure.in:12: with aclocal and run automake again.

Re: Current versions of automake and autoconf

2003-11-24 Thread Akim Demaille
> Anyway, back to Dalibor's question: > 2.57 is the last version announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2.58 is the last version available on ftp.gnu.org > 2.59 is the last version (pre-)announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Which one is to be considered the last official release? I > understa

Re: Current versions of automake and autoconf

2003-11-24 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Akim> Unfortunately it relied on this obscurity: it is Akim> important, if you want some real feedback, that many Akim> people use it as a real release. So if I flag it as a Akim> pre-release, I doubt it will be tested as thorough