On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
> The MANS primary seems to do what you want. See:
>
> info automake Documentation Man
>
> Regards,
>
>
Hello,
And thank you for your feedback. Ive read the infopage, but it didnt
exactly say what I needed to do. (I believe it describes the correc
$B"##L#o#v#e!u#L#o#v#e!!%/%j%C%/(B
$B!~%*%s%i%$%s$G4JC1EPO?!*(B
$B!~7HBSMQ%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\#O#K!y(B
$B!~"-"-"->\$7$/$O0J2<#U#R#L$K$F"-"-"-(B
$B!~(B http://www.xx.cc/
>>> "Bob" == Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bob> This is looking more and more like a typo in the tag line.
No it's not.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > Charles Wilson writes:
> Chuck> What is this "Autoconf 2.59" of which you speak? I saw this
>
> I'm using the AUTOCONF-2_59 tag from CVS. I didn't know it
> hasn't been announced yet. All I can say is that Akim is away
> today and tomorrow, so you'll have to wait
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Gary> I got the ball rolling for this oft discussed macro by putting it in
Gary> autoconf and using it in libtoolize. My perl fu is insufficient to the
Gary> task of supporting it from automake (aclocal et
>>> "Chuck" == Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chuck> What is this "Autoconf 2.59" of which you speak? I saw this
Chuck> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2003-11/msg00010.html
Chuck> But there does not yet appear to be a tarball available.
I'm using the AUTOCONF-2_5
