On Friday 29 August 2003 10:56 pm, Norman Gray wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We as a project have decided to go the route of checking
> autotool-generated files into our CVS repository, and as a result are
> discovering the full subtleties of the consequences of that, in
> particular the issues concernin
Greetings,
We as a project have decided to go the route of checking
autotool-generated files into our CVS repository, and as a result are
discovering the full subtleties of the consequences of that, in
particular the issues concerning timestamps in checked-out files. I
think I've addressed th
Tom Howard writes:
> That's my point. My understanding of Stephen problem is that he doesn't want
> to build/install the companion files.
[...]
> So in his situation, patching libtool and using -shared isn't really going to
> solve his problem. Correct?
As already pointed out by Daniel Reed, -a
Dear friend,
Compliment of the day, I am JOHN KYARI, The son of late General Kubwa Kyari of the
Democratic Republic of Congo.
My father was a General in the Congolese Army. In his position (My father) with the
office of the presidentcy during the regime of Laurent kabila, he was assigned on a
On Aug 29, 2003, at 12:55 AM, Daniel Reed wrote:
To produce only .la and .so files, you can pass -module -avoid-version
to
libtool. In Automake, you can do this by using something similar to:
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = mymod.la
mymod_la_SOURCES = mymod.c
mymod_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
This
Why don't you provide an install_hook and copy only the .so file to your
module directory?
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:18, Tom Howard wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2003 16:21, Stephen Torri wrote:
> > I am trying to build libraries that will act as modules in a program. At
> > present when I do a c
Hi, I am the fml mailing list manager for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Hmm, you may be not a member.
1. Your mail may come from a bad address which is not
registered in this mailing list
2. Your mail has a syntax error.
If you would like to subscribe this mailing list
subscribe YOUR NAME
On Friday 29 August 2003 17:56, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> I'm afraid I have no idea what else you are expecting.
:) Does that mean that you don't understand what I'm trying to do, or that
there isn't a way?
What I was after is that dist-X would create just the X distribution and
nothing mo
>>> "Tom" == Tom Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Tom> I almost though I had it all working perfectly, then I
Tom> realized that by adding dist-foobar to dist-hook, then
Tom> dist-foobar is build everytime any type of dist is built
Tom> (e.g. dist-gzip, dist-bzip2, etc)
Tom> Any oth
Hi Ralph,
On Friday 29 August 2003 16:53, Schleicher Ralph (LLI) wrote:
> In libtool jargon, ".so file" is a synonym for a shared library.
> This includes all companion files, but their names and number
> depend on libtool's configuration and build options. E.g., HP-UX
> uses .sl instead of .so f
Tom Howard writes:
> Sorry if I'm being dense, but (after reading the referenced messages) I don't
> understand why using the -shared flag will only produce the a .so file.
> Won't it still produce a .so.X, .so.X.X.X and .la files as well?
In libtool jargon, ".so file" is a synonym for a shared l
On 2003-08-29T14:14+1000, Tom Howard wrote:
) On Thursday 28 August 2003 16:08, Schleicher Ralph (LLI) wrote:
) > > So by patching my libtool I should be able to put the -shared flag in my
) > > AM_LDFLAGS for the Makefile.am and only get the shared.so file right?
) > Yes, but it makes sense adding
Hi,
On Thursday 28 August 2003 16:08, Schleicher Ralph (LLI) wrote:
> > So by patching my libtool I should be able to put the -shared flag in my
> > AM_LDFLAGS for the Makefile.am and only get the shared.so file right?
>
> Yes, but it makes sense adding it to CFLAGS, too.
Sorry if I'm being dense
Bonjour,
Le support technique de Netissime.com vous remercie de votre message et vous répondra
dans les plus brefs délais.
Cordialement
Le support technique
On Friday 29 August 2003 00:50, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> [...]
> Tom> While I'm at it, if I have a target 'dist-foobar' is there
> Tom> a way to have the 'dist' target call the 'dist-foobar'
> Tom> target as well?
> [...]
>
> See dist-hook in the manual.
I almost though I had it all workin
15 matches
Mail list logo
