I haven't looked at this yet.
Take a look at the appended `make' output. Why are we building in
`tests' twice?
Tom
Making all in .
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/tromey/gnu/Auto/automake/build'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tromey/gnu/Auto/autom
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Take a look at the appended `make' output. Why are we building in
>> `tests' twice?
Alexandre> There are two different tests/ directories on HEAD...
Duh, I can't read. Sorry about that.
Tom
>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adl> [http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-07/msg00052.html]
adl> Sorry for the delay.
[...]
Jim> What do you think about dropping that warning altogether,
adl> Someone complained that Automake used such variables
* I wrote on Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:12:27AM CEST:
>
> automake's depcomp script could be adjusted to recognize the dependency
> generation option of the KAI C++/C compiler, version 4.0. Don't know if
> this would be useful to people, as the compiler is not developed any
> more, but just in case:
Thanks. However, I noticed that I am only getting the
excessing output with gcc & g++; g77 files are compiling
“nicer” (i.e. as single lines with the options rather than
everything else). Any hints?
Hi all,
I'm sorry if this question has been asked and answered before, but when I
generate the aclocal.m4 file (using aclocal version 1.7.6), it puts the
line:
AC_PREREQ([2.54])
as the first macro.
This is slightly inconvenient as I then can't use the generated Makefiles
on a system which d
>>> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Harlan> Is there a way to pass configure options to distcheck's
Harlan> "configure" run?
See DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 03:27, B.J. Black wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I have a directory structure that is similar to the following:
>
> foo/
> foo/bar/
> foo/bar/foobar/
> foo/bar/barfoo/
>
> The only file in foo/bar is Makefile.am, as it has no actual source in
> it (just subdirs). The foo/Makefile.a
Hi, all!
I have a directory structure that is similar to the following:
foo/
foo/bar/
foo/bar/foobar/
foo/bar/barfoo/
The only file in foo/bar is Makefile.am, as it has no actual source in
it (just subdirs). The foo/Makefile.am has in it:
...
SUBDIRS=bar
...
And foo/bar/Makefil
ARFLAGS is supported in current CVS Automake.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
I have a subroutine that is only conditionally built.
I have listed this subroutine in DIST_SUBDIRS, as that's where I gather the
list of subdirs that must be in a distribution but might not be built are
specified.
With 1.7.6, distcheck now fails as it tries to "cd" to this directory inside
the =
Dear list members,
To bring up an issue that has been brought up to this list at least
since 1999 and never provided a satisfactory result.
I want to be able to set AR and ARFLAGS using automake.
No discussion possible and I am not even going to discuss why because
that doesn't seem to help in
apsoocvaoh hqawmaa xi at t
u
j gdpp cjegcykc sewes yhurxz
oft nm
Hi,
Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a subroutine that is only conditionally built.
>
> I have listed this subroutine in DIST_SUBDIRS, as that's where I
> gather the list of subdirs that must be in a distribution but might
> not be built are specified.
>
> With 1.7.6, distcheck n
>>> "Erik" == Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Erik> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> ARFLAGS is supported in current CVS Automake.
Erik> Are you kidding me?
No.
Erik> It's not supported in the latest stable release.
Correct.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi,
Since 3.31 version, aCC could handle dependencies.
It's better to use it because makedepend is -very very very- slow and
don't understand anything to -A* flag which affect include path.
So, i wrote this little piece of code for depcomp which works well for me:
i just add an aCC section befor
DONT BECOME ANOTHER STATISTIC - INSTALL VIRUS PROTECTION NOW
Most users dont realize they have a virus, and find out after its too late.
All emails are scanned automatically with Norton Antivirus!
btw, you look great today.
Total PC Protection RIGHT NOW.
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/default.asp?id=30
From: Mrs. Rebecca Zayyad Daoud
I am the above named person from Tunisia but now undergoing medical treatment.
I am married to Dr.Zayyad Daoud who worked with Malaysia embassy in Nigeria for nine
years, before he died in the year 2000. We were both married for eleven years without
a child.
H
Bookman Publishing has developed an exclusive list of over 500 independent
film makers. For just $199, we will write an AP style press release for
your book, and send it by email directly to this brand new list.
Independent artists made films like The Blair Witch Project and Bowling for
Columbine
A simple (trivial?) question. Is there a flag in
automake to reduce the output that the user sees
(not the -s in gmake); for instance I am gettting
as one example:
-c -o ftwi_64.lo `test -f 'ftwi_64.c' || echo './'`ftwi_64.c; \
then mv ".deps/ftwi_64.Tpo" ".deps/ftwi_64.Plo"; \
else rm -f ".deps
>>> "L" == L D Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
L> A simple (trivial?) question. Is there a flag in
L> automake to reduce the output that the user sees
In short: no.
Debates about build cosmetics can be found in the list archives.
IIRC they never reached any please-all solution.
--
Alexandre
Oh, for the love of Pete. You are, of course, quite correct. I can't
believe I forgot something so silly. Thanks bunches!
--bj
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 21:26, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Sounds as if you might have missed to list some Makefiles in your
> configure.ac's AC_CONFIG_FILES
>
> Ralf
In this case, the subdir is another auto* package.
I *could* solve this by passing an argument to distcheck's "configure" , but
I didn't see how to do that, either.
Is there a way to pass configure options to distcheck's "configure" run?
H
--
> Hi,
>
> Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> Couldn't figure out why automake was including the ".c" file for the lex
> code when doing "make dist".
>
> Eventually read the manual ;-) Which said this is what it is suppose to do.
>
> Since the generated C code isn't portable it
24 matches
Mail list logo
