The original message was received at Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:07:08 -0400 (EDT)
from rly-xi01.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.6]
*** ATTENTION ***
Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you have any advice or ways to streamline the process I would very
much like to hear it.
spend one hour a week as a group reading change logs (and only change
logs -- no code!) for the week preceding. discuss applicability of
changes, especially whether or not the
Changelogs are *not* a lot of work: they *save* a lot of work!
Just my personal opinion, of course, but this is how *I* work:
1. make changes
2. diff with current CVS > patch
3. read patch and write the changelog for the patch
4. attach patch to the changelog and save it in my personal patch archi
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reporting-MTA: dns;udcexbh02.us.trendnet.org
Received-From-MTA: dns;udcintlab01.udc.trendmicro.com
Arrival-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 02:37:18 -0700
Final-Recipie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I want to follow correct GNU style but this ChangeLog file just seems like
> too much work. Doesn't everyone agree?
No. ChangeLogs take work, but it's generally useful work if done right.
I often refer to ChangeLogs to figure out what happened and why.
You don't want
