Re: Multiple makefiles and rules for CONFIG_HEADER and CONFIG_FILEentries

2003-02-13 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Sander" == Sander Niemeijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Sander> Now I recently discovered that automake places the Sander> rules to rebuild foo.h from foo.h.in (with the use of a Sander> stamp-h* file) in the Makefile of the directory where Sander> foo.h will appear if that directo

Re: Automake 1.7.2b uploaded (beta for 1.7.3)

2003-02-13 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> Hello, Robert> I have a problem with the beta, after bootstrapping a Robert> fresh checkout of Libtool with Autoconf 2.57 and Automake Robert> 1.7.2b, I get a make distcheck error. Apparently the Robert> distcheck fails becaus

Re: Automake 1.7.2b uploaded (beta for 1.7.3)

2003-02-13 Thread Robert Boehne
Hello, I have a problem with the beta, after bootstrapping a fresh checkout of Libtool with Autoconf 2.57 and Automake 1.7.2b, I get a make distcheck error. Apparently the distcheck fails because files are left over in the insallation directory after "make uninstall" is run. Below are the offendi

Multiple makefiles and rules for CONFIG_HEADER and CONFIG_FILEentries

2003-02-13 Thread Sander Niemeijer
Hi, I have a package that uses multiple makefiles: one toplevel makefile and some makefiles in subdirectories. The build in several of these subdirectories requires the use of a single include file (lets call it foo.h) that is created from foo.h.in by configure. Now I recently discovered that a