Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
William> This doesn't seem correct as the C++ flags aren't
William> necessarily appropriate for linking.
The example you sent to Guido uses `AM_CXXFLAGS = -DSOMETHING'.
I wouldn't expect this to cause any trouble during linking. Does it?
(If so you should probably
Braden McDaniel schrieb:
Quoting Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Braden" == Braden McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Braden> I've reviewed 7.2 in the GNU Coding Standards, and it's
Braden> not clear to me what you're referring to. Where exactly
Braden> should I be lookin
>>> "Braden" == Braden McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Braden> I've reviewed 7.2 in the GNU Coding Standards, and it's
Braden> not clear to me what you're referring to. Where exactly
Braden> should I be looking?
The following sentence in the `Variables for Specifying Commands'
sect
>>> "Braden" == Braden McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Braden> GNU make doesn't agree.
I hear you, but that no reason: Automake follows the GNU Coding
Standards in this case.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Quoting Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> "Braden" == Braden McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Braden> GNU make doesn't agree.
>
> I hear you, but that no reason: Automake follows the GNU Coding
> Standards in this case.
I've reviewed 7.2 in the GNU Coding Standards, and i
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 03:47, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "William" == William S Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> William> I see that CXXFLAGS and AM_CXXFLAGS gets passed to the linker
> William> ($CXXLINK).
>
> CXXLINK calls the compiler, so we ought to pass these flags as they
> m
>>> "William" == William S Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> I see that CXXFLAGS and AM_CXXFLAGS gets passed to the linker
William> ($CXXLINK).
CXXLINK calls the compiler, so we ought to pass these flags as they
may affect the way the compiler calls the linker in the end.
For instanc
