Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh

2002-09-25 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 25 Sep 2002 12:03:42 +0200 > > Please, install! OK, done. I did find some errors in my proposed text (it didn't give the obvious workaround, and it credited the wrong people for the patch -- ouch!), so I installed the following patch instead.

Re: Problem with 'make distcheck'

2002-09-25 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I know in the past it didn't work to put `$(top_srcdir)' in a path in >> a _SOURCES variable. Alexandre, has this changed? >> I don't think this would cause your problem necessarily, but it is an >> oddity. This is definitely t

Re: Automake 1.7 released

2002-09-25 Thread Eric Dorland
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Great Alexandre :) Is this version backwards compatible with 1.6? Or will it break on some Makefile.am's that worked with automake 1.6? Just wanting to know if i

Automake 1.7 released

2002-09-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.7. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. The NEWS entry is appended. You can find the new release here: ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/automake/automake-1.7.tar.gz ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/automake/automake-1.7.tar.

Re: Problem with 'make distcheck'

2002-09-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello! On Wednesday 25 September 2002 11:13, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sebastian> libTACOExtensions_la_SOURCES = > $(top_srcdir)/server/src/TACOServer.cpp \ > > I know in the past it didn't work to put `$(top_srcdir)' in a path in > a

Re: Problem with 'make distcheck'

2002-09-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Tom> I know in the past it didn't work to put `$(top_srcdir)' in a path in Tom> a _SOURCES variable. Alexandre, has this changed? Not to my knowledge. The issue I remember is PR/325. [...] -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: texinfo10 prob

2002-09-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Patrick> On the computers without TeX installed, all tests pass Patrick> fine, but the one with TeX hangs at Patrick> PASS: texinfo10.test Patrick> [1] + Stopped (tty input)gmake check Patrick> (is it running texinfo10, or t

Re: Problem with 'make distcheck'

2002-09-25 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sebastian> libTACOExtensions_la_SOURCES = $(top_srcdir)/server/src/TACOServer.cpp \ I know in the past it didn't work to put `$(top_srcdir)' in a path in a _SOURCES variable. Alexandre, has this changed? I don't think this would

Re: Should ylwap get installed by autoreconf -i?

2002-09-25 Thread Tom Tromey
Harlan> I have the current software project almost building using 2.54 Harlan> and pre-1.7, ylwrap is not present and is not being missed. I saw some email on the patch list about this too. ylwrap is only needed if you have more than one yacc source file (or more than one lex source file) in a g

texinfo10 prob

2002-09-25 Thread Patrick Welche
On the computers without TeX installed, all tests pass fine, but the one with TeX hangs at PASS: texinfo10.test [1] + Stopped (tty input)gmake check (is it running texinfo10, or texinfo13?) apparently because it is running "tex --version". On my version of TeX, that gets: % tex --version

Re: Hey SEXY!

2002-09-25 Thread Jodana Cox
Yo Sexy Baby See My Nude Photos @ http://www.adultillusions.com

Re: autoreconf misses ltmain.sh

2002-09-25 Thread Akim Demaille
| > I have not read all the details yet, but does anybody know what we | > must do to cope with Libtool 1.4.2? | | How about this patch to Autoconf? It should let us limp along until a | new libtool version is published. | | --- old/BUGS 2002-03-26 08:14:37.0 -0800 | +++ new/BUGS 200

Re: Problem with 'make distcheck'

2002-09-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sebastian> Why are these files in the build directory? No idea, sorry. Could you send a bug report? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

grub-0.92 and CVS automake...

2002-09-25 Thread Harlan Stenn
Sorry if this is lame, but it's been a Long Day and I'm wasted. It looks like grub-0.92 has Difficulty with ac-2.54 and am-CVS. The problem is that grub likes the "old style" of AS rules, and current automake/autoconf Really Want grub to use AM_PROG_AS. Making this change means asm.S no longer