-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 01 August 2002 21:56, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Ladislav> [lada@smrz ~]$ automake --version
> Ladislav> automake (GNU automake) 1.5
>
> Thanks. The current
Hi Respond,
>>> "Respond" == Respond To List Only <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Respond> Let me preface this with the comment that, although it
Respond> may lok like I'm ranting on some small issue that
Respond> suddenly pushed me into a fit of rage, I'm actually
Respond> sanely trying to rais
>>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Ladislav> [lada@smrz ~]$ automake --version
Ladislav> automake (GNU automake) 1.5
Thanks. The current version is 1.6.3, could you try that? If
it still doesn't work, could you send in your Makefile.am and
the resulting Mak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 01 August 2002 17:50, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Ladislav> I am trying to move our school project to automake.
>
> What version of Automake?
[lada@sm
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 09:22:42AM -0700, John Millaway wrote:
> > I don't think you can. However if you name your lexer `foo.ll'
> > then Automake will build `foo.cc'.
>
> I can't believe there is no way to override this. ylwrap is a most frustrating
> addition to automake.
It's probably beca
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Respond To List Only wrote:
> So, one comparison function for Automake, one for OpenSSL, one for the
> next program, one for the next program... Again, creating upstream
> problems for downstream users.
Emphatically agreed.
> > # For the purpose of orde
> I don't think you can. However if you name your lexer `foo.ll'
> then Automake will build `foo.cc'.
I can't believe there is no way to override this. ylwrap is a most frustrating
addition to automake.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel bet
>>> "John" == John Millaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> We want to build "foo.cc" from "foo.l". Automake tries
John> build "foo.c" instead (using ylwrap). How do we disable
John> this entirely or at least tell automake that the output
John> files for *.l should be named *.cc ?
I don't
Hi!
>>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Ladislav> I am trying to move our school project to automake.
What version of Automake?
[...]
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Let me preface this with the comment that, although it may lok like I'm
ranting on some small issue that suddenly pushed me into a fit of rage,
I'm actually sanely trying to raise points that I feel were not
considered dutring the lifespan of automake and other projects. Please
don't be insulted
We want to build "foo.cc" from "foo.l". Automake tries build "foo.c" instead
(using ylwrap). How do we disable this entirely or at least tell automake that
the output files for *.l should be named *.cc ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel bet
>>> "Respond" == Respond To List Only <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Respond> ...and how *is* the logic for 1.6b compared to 1.6.3 ? Is that like
Respond> 1.(6.2).0 > 1.6.3 ?
Here is how this logic is documented in the source.
(Automake contains a comparison function for its version numbers,
may
Alexandre;
Just want to steal the soapbox here to point out that "1.6b" is more
difficult for automated systems to deal with than "1.6.2". Consider the
logic to determine whether 1.4-p4 is greater than 1.4.2 or 1.5.
> ... works with 1.6.3 but doesn't with 1.6b. ...
...and how *is* the logic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am sorry to ask such a simple questions but I am really lost here.
I am trying to move our school project to automake.
I have succeeded building programs, but I am stuck with .so files.
Currently (with a hand written Makefile) it works like
>>> "Bob" == Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bob> Any idea when 1.7 will be released (roughly, obviously; I
Bob> mean, months? weeks? days?) I've got a build tree in a
Bob> cvs that uses cvs automake. It's waiting for 1.7 until
Bob> it's committed :)
CVS Automake needs Autocon
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 20:17, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> If you have some time, please try it on your package and report any
> issue you encounter. Especially, please shout loud if your package
> works with 1.6.3 but doesn't with 1.6b. (It'll better for everybody
> if we can fix compatibility
Bu seneki DV 2004 Green Card lottery programi basvuru
tarihleri ve detaylari yayinlanmistir, ayrica DV 2003
sonuclarini sitemizden bulabilirsiniz.
Turkiyeden 1629 kisi bu sene ABD Green Card lotosunu
kazanmistir. Bu kazananlar arasinda www.greencardusa.cc
sirketi tarafindan basvuru yapan 74
17 matches
Mail list logo
