企业经理人的策略顾问 ,不景气时局的咨询良师。

2002-07-16 Thread xmailer
=?GB2312?B?zfjVvqO6d3d3LnMtbGVhZGVycy5jb20=?= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_2rfkindysadvnqw3nerasdf"; charset="GB2312" MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 02:59:40 +0800 X-Priority: 1 X-Library: Indy 9.0.3

¼îÅ· °øµ¿±¸¸Å/±âȹÀü [±¤°í]

2002-07-16 Thread 4989¼îÇθô
Title: ::¼ÒÈ£¸¶Æ®±âȹÀü::

Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]

2002-07-16 Thread Bob Ham
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 00:28, Tom Tromey wrote: > To be fair, sometimes one is forced to use tools one might prefer not > to. For instance, suppose you need to do some work on gcc. Well, > some directories in gcc use automake. If you hate automake, what can > you do? Historically the answer is

Re: AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external]) broken

2002-07-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Bruno Haible wrote: >>gettext.m4 doesn't set BUILD_INCLUDED_GETTEXT or >>USE_INCLUDED_GETTEXT (to 'no') when 'external' is specified; the >>variables are left unspec'ed. **probably** not a problem -- unless >>you gettextize in order to work around the automake bug, like I did >> -- in which case

Re: AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external]) broken

2002-07-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Charles Wilson wrote: > gettext.m4 doesn't set BUILD_INCLUDED_GETTEXT or > USE_INCLUDED_GETTEXT (to 'no') when 'external' is specified; the > variables are left unspec'ed. **probably** not a problem -- unless > you gettextize in order to work around the automake bug, like I did > -- in which cas

Re: How to get .o not .lo files in foo_LINK command?

2002-07-16 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi Grzegorz, >>> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Jakacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Grzegorz> I am using Automake 1.6 / Autoconf 2.53 / Libtool 1.4.2. [...] Grzegorz> foo_SOURCES = $(SRCS) Grzegorz> foo_pure_SOURCES = $(SRCS) Grzegorz> libfoo_la_SOURCES = $(SRCS) [...] Grzegorz> I do not under