Re: Large project support

>>> "Richard" == Richard Boulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Richard> Surely one thing we could do is to implement wildcards Richard> that are evaluated at the time that automake is run. [...] Richard> It is still true that it would be impossible to ensure Richard> that the Makefile.in

Re: first time automaking question

>>> "Sean" == Sean Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Sean> - create a Makefile.am Sean> - edit configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE and AM_CONFIG_HEADER) Sean> - re-run aclocal Sean> - re-run autoconf Sean> - run automake (--foreign :^>) `autoreconf' can do these three steps for you Se

Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

(This problem is taking on a life of its own, so I bit the bullet and subscribed to the list...) I need to backpedal a little on my earlier statement. Regarding eliminating duplicate library targets, I said: Commenting out the first two lines does get rid of the error message and my bu

Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 16:57, Skip Montanaro wrote: > I just installed autoconf 2.53 and as a result wound up installing the > Release-1-6 snapshot from the automake CVS tree. Automake now complains: > > automake: src/Makefile.am: object `alf.lo' created both with libtool and without The sam

Re: first time automaking question

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:34:48AM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "Sean" == Sean Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sean> - ./configure now tests for auto* and makeinfo > > Sean> is that really necessary? > > Yes. Automake create Makefiles that know how to rerun the auto* > tool

Re: Large project support

On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 18:26, Tom Tromey wrote: > Also wildcards wouldn't interact well with some automake features. > That's because we need to do certain things statically to work around > problems and missing features in vendor makes. > > As an example suppose you want to use per-executable CFL

Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

Skip> lib_LIBRARIES = libalf.a Skip> libalf_a_SOURCES = alf.c alf.h common.h Skip> lib_LTLIBRARIES = libalf.la Skip> libalf_la_SOURCES = alf.c alf.h common.h Tom> In this particular case can't you just rely on libtool to create Tom> the static library for you? I don't kn

Re: Large project support

> "Timo" == Timo K Suoranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Timo> Yes I have read those. I still do not understand the reason why Timo> it is so, Wildcards are unreliable, and with automake we try to promote reliable builds. For instance that is why we use full instead of partial dependency inf

Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Skip> lib_LIBRARIES = libalf.a Skip> libalf_a_SOURCES = alf.c alf.h common.h Skip> lib_LTLIBRARIES = libalf.la Skip> libalf_la_SOURCES = alf.c alf.h common.h In this particular case can't you just rely on libtool to create the stati

Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

[CCing Johannes who posted the very same question one week ago.] >>> "Skip" == Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Skip> I just installed autoconf 2.53 and as a result wound up Skip> installing the Release-1-6 snapshot from the automake CVS Skip> tree. Automake now complains: Skip>

automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

I just installed autoconf 2.53 and as a result wound up installing the Release-1-6 snapshot from the automake CVS tree. Automake now complains: automake: src/Makefile.am: object `alf.lo' created both with libtool and without The relevant Makefile.am file is lib_LIBRARIES = libalf.a

ContactMyFriends uxq

Schulfreunde,    Familienangehoerige,    Urlaubflirts,   Bekanntschaften,    Verzogene Personen...    

^,.^ 천자문 일일 학습 무료! -광-고-

Title: ::: HANJAWA.COM Ãßõ ¸ÞÀÏ :::   WWW.HANJAWA.COM ÇÑÀÚ¿Í ´åÄÄ ¼Ò°³ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Çѹø Àо½Ã±â ¹Ù¶ø´Ï´Ù.

Best Business Opportunity of the Decade!

Title: Secured Investements Earn 15%-300% Interest On Your Money GUARANTEED BY THE GOVERNMENT! Government Secured Tax Cerificates Provide: The highest guaranteed interest returns compared to any other investment. A return up to 100 times your mo

Re: Large project support

Yes I have read those. I still do not understand the reason why it is so, but I think I can live with it by making the work around scripts. Unfortunately I am very unexperienced script writer so I was hoping someone already had such script. > Timo> My problem is that my current Makefile.in use

Re: Building library

>>> "BERTRAND" == BERTRAND Joël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] BERTRAND> How can I force libtool to include the external BERTRAND> libraries use by librpl in librpl ? Since no one answered you should probably try to ask the [EMAIL PROTECTED] people. (Personally I thought it was enough to

Re: first time automaking question

>>> "Sean" == Sean Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sean> hey all-- Sean> A few weeks ago I began the transition over to autoconf/automake by Sean> taking my semester's project and incorporating autoconf into the Sean> package. everything works really fine, only now I'm having trouble Sea