Re: Large project support

2002-04-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Timo" == Timo K Suoranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Timo> My problem is that my current Makefile.in uses wildcards Timo> to find out source files - something which I can not use Timo> with automake, it seems. No you can't. If you ask google with words like `Automake' and `wildcard' it

Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files

2002-04-09 Thread joachim.j.gloger
Yup it does, you are great. Thank you very much. Regards Joachim === J. M. Gloger, DaimlerChrysler AG, Research Center Ulm P.O. Box 2360, 89013 Ulm, Germany Phone: +49 731 505 2353 Fax: +49 731 505 4113 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

first time automaking question

2002-04-09 Thread Sean Finney
hey all-- A few weeks ago I began the transition over to autoconf/automake by taking my semester's project and incorporating autoconf into the package. everything works really fine, only now I'm having trouble incorporating automake into the fray. namely, there are two specific problems:

Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files

2002-04-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > You will find our acsite.m4 and the configure.in attached to this email. In LAB_RECONFIGURE you run perl scripts/am_edit >/dev/null 2>&1 I understand it is meant to patch Automake generated Makefile.in's. Does it happen to change the first line o

Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files

2002-04-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> Wow. Did you changed something in your configure.in and >> Makefile.am's during this jump? > No, we changed nothing. Should we ? Not necessarily. These tools should be backward compatible (althought they sometime failed to). [...] > In the who

Re: Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files

2002-04-09 Thread joachim.j.gloger
> > > > we just upgrading to > > > > > > > automake 1.6(from 1.4) > > > > autoconf 2.53 (from 2.13) > > > > libtool 1.4.2 (from 1.3.5) > > Excuse me for asking the obvious, but have you configured & installed all > three under the same prefix (e.g., ./configure --prefix=/us

Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files

2002-04-09 Thread F J Franklin
> > > we just upgrading to > > > > > automake 1.6(from 1.4) > > > autoconf 2.53 (from 2.13) > > > libtool 1.4.2 (from 1.3.5) Excuse me for asking the obvious, but have you configured & installed all three under the same prefix (e.g., ./configure --prefix=/usr)? Frank Fra

Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files

2002-04-09 Thread joachim.j.gloger
Hi, thank you very much for your reply and your detailed questions. I try to answer them as good as possible. Here we go. > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > we just upgrading to > > > automake 1.6(from 1.4) > > autoconf 2.53 (from 2.13) > > libtool 1.4.2

Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files

2002-04-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > we just upgrading to > automake 1.6(from 1.4) > autoconf 2.53 (from 2.13) > libtool 1.4.2 (from 1.3.5) Wow. Did you changed something in your configure.in and Makefile.am's during this jump? > and now the package won't compil