RE: `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS'

2002-04-05 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:07 AM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' > > > Hi Robert, > > >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Re: automake 1.6 test failures

2002-04-05 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Dave" == Dave Brondsema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> What shell are you using? This looks similar to PR/305 (if >> so, this should be fixed in CVS Automake, could you try >> that?) Dave> bash. Hmm, which version? Dave> i'll try the CVS version thanks [...] Dave> /usr/

Building library

2002-04-05 Thread BERTRAND Joël
Hello, I'm working on a big project which contains a executable program and two libraries (static and dynamic). Thus, I have written in Makefile.am : bin_PROGRAMS = rpl lib_LTLIBRARIES = librpl.la ... rpl_SOURCES = $(SRCC) $(SRCH) $(SRCF) $(INIT_EXE) rpl_LDFLAGS = -rdynamic l