Title: netOffice.TV!
webTrax.TV™ - is an all inclusive, integrated, easy to use web and
ecommerce tracking and analysis system!CLICK HERE to see
webTrax.TV!Start making
Money by getting your ecommer
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ, you are member of this list, and as such, your opinion is not
> that of a regular naive user. Sure you can answer to me that you need
> to be an expert to use Autoconf, but then, I'm precisely trying to
> kill this.
There are a lot of things tha
Akim Demaille writes:
> Because I fail to see the advantage for Automake to have to clean
> itself, rather than asking the cleaning.
Automake already does all the other cleaning, so you could say it's quite
good at it. Autoconf hasn't done any cleaning so far.
> That's better to my eyes, also
> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Akim Demaille writes:
>> Because I fail to see the advantage for Automake to have to clean
>> itself, rather than asking the cleaning.
Peter> Automake already does all the other cleaning, so you could say
Peter> it's quite good
Akim Demaille writes:
> I don't agree. The important part is that I, as a maintainer of the
> foo package, focus on my task, and be relieved of all these stupid
> details. It has to work for me, not the converse.
If a package maintainer wants to be relieved from stupid details, he can
use Aut
--- Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> "Dave" == Dave Brondsema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dave> dirforbid.test and pr300-ltlib.test fail after
> Dave> ./configure
> Dave> make
> Dave> make check
>
> Dave> cygwin on windows XP
> Dave> uname -a = CYGWIN_NT-5.1 DPB2
> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 02 Apr 2002 18:57:05
>> +0200
>>
>> it makes no sense at all the distclean a single directory, as
>> anyway you need to rerun config.status to re-enable this directory.
>> Of course, knowledg
Hi Robert,
>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> I get this with automake 1.6...
Robert> configure.in:538: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly,
Robert> use AC_LIBOBJ (see section `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS'
Robert> yet the info pages don't seem to have such a sectio
I get this with automake 1.6...
configure.in:538: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see
section
`AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS'
yet the info pages don't seem to have such a section.
Where is this documented? (And what should I change).
Rob
| > So you are throwing away the non Automake users, and you lose the
| > ability to run ./configure --clean without Makefile (precisely after a
| > distclean).
|
| Why can't you do this:
|
| %% AC_CONFIG_DISTCLEANFILES(FILES)
| %% Clean FILES
| AC_DEFUN([AC_CONFIG_DISTCLEANFILES],
| [ac_distcl
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You miss one point: killing this impedance problem. When Autoconf
>> adds new files, e.g., autom4te.cache, Automake is immediately
>> obsoleted, because it does not remove this file.
Russ
>>> "Dave" == Dave Brondsema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> dirforbid.test and pr300-ltlib.test fail after
Dave> ./configure
Dave> make
Dave> make check
Dave> cygwin on windows XP
Dave> uname -a = CYGWIN_NT-5.1 DPB2 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14
Dave> i686 unknown
Dave> libtool 1.
Es schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
>
> Akim Demaille writes:
>
> > What I'm doing now is buying my freedom. The freedom to extend
> > Autoconf without 1. requiring from the rest of the world that they
> > adjust their distclean rules, 2. requiring that Automake folks release
> > a newer Automake etc.
13 matches
Mail list logo
