I am newbie in using automake/autoconf programs.
I am running into the following problem. Any help is really appreciated
I initially had a working system in my machine, with autoconf version 2.13
Then when I created new source(.c) files in my tree, I read the documentation
to generate new makefiles
Es schrieb Paul Lew:
>
> > "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> You may want to have a look at my packaging of Autoconf 2.13
> Ben> and Autoconf 2.52 for Debian, which includes an heuristic
> Ben> that automatically picks the right version of Autoconf to run
>
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Paul" == Paul Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> 383 - @AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@
@am__quote@$(DEPDIR)/SQLAllocHandle.Plo@am__quote@
Tom> This usually means you didn't re-run aclocal + autoconf, or
Tom> you ran the wrong
Paul Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> You may want to have a look at my packaging of Autoconf 2.13
> Ben> and Autoconf 2.52 for Debian, which includes an heuristic
> Ben> that automatically picks the right version of Auto
Hi Alexandre,
with this changes all test work correctly
Thanks
Jens
Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2002 13:31 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz:
> > configure.in:8: error: `Makefile' is already registered with
> > AC_CONFIG_FILES or AC_OUTPUT.
>
> Thanks! This is a bug in the testsuite that you can safe
> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> New in 1.6:
>> * Autoconf 2.52 is required.
Lars> That's bad. I have no intention yet to switch my projects to 2.5x.
This is what made this release "1.6" instead of "1.5.1".
Tom
Thaks for your patch, and I got below!
===
All 360 tests behaved as expected (4 expected failures)
===
I'm now using Automake-1.6.
--
Nishio Futoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> configure.in:8: error: `Makefile' is already registered with
> AC_CONFIG_FILES or AC_OUTPUT.
Thanks! This is a bug in the testsuite that you can safely ignore.
(Akim: any idea why CVS Autoconf does not print this error anymore?)
I'm checking in the following fix.
Index: ChangeLog
Hi Alexandre,
the output of uname -a is:
Linux sisyphos 2.4.10 #1 Thu Oct 4 11:01:39 CEST 2001 i686 unknown
I'm using bash as shell:
bash --version gives:
GNU bash, version 2.05.0(1)-release (i386-suse-linux)
Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
additionally I use autoconf and libtool
I got same FAIL messages for pr300-*.test.
OS: Linux 2.4.4
SHELL: GNU bash, version 2.04.26(1)-release (i586-redhat-linux-gnu)
PERL: This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i586-linux
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.52
Do you need any other infomations?
Thanks
---
$ make check VERBOSE=x TESTS='pr300-lib.test
Hi Jens,
>>> "Jens" == Jens Krüger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jens> After configuring, make and make check I got three errors:
Jens> FAIL: pr300-lib.test
Jens> FAIL: pr300-ltlib.test
Jens> FAIL: pr300-prog.test
Could you send us the ouput of
make check VERBOSE=x TESTS='pr300-lib.test p
> "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> You may want to have a look at my packaging of Autoconf 2.13
Ben> and Autoconf 2.52 for Debian, which includes an heuristic
Ben> that automatically picks the right version of Autoconf to run
Ben> in most cases.
Thanks for
> The problem we have is ucd-snmp choked on autoconf 2.52 and forced us
> to roll back to 2.13. With autoconf 2.13 we cannot upgrade the
> automake to 1.6 which requires autoconf 2.52. Can you see the problem
> now?
I often have fun with this kind of incompatibility. I'm no expert, but
I've fou
13 matches
Mail list logo
