help in installing new automake

2002-02-04 Thread julz uddia
hi, i'm currently using automake 1.4. i need automake 1.5, therfore i have downloaded it but the installation doesn't seem to be working. i placed the downloaded automake1.5.tar.gz in the /usr directory. i did a './configure'. then i did a 'make' but the messages say 'entering ... directory

[Á¤º¸]»ç¾÷¾ÆÀÌÅÛcd¸¦ º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù(ÀÚ°Ý:´ëÁ¹,33¼¼ÀÌ»ó)

2002-02-04 Thread ¹ÚÁ¤Èñ
»ç¾÷Á¤º¸¸¦ ´ãÀº CD¸¦ º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù¾È³çÇϽʴϱî? inter-NETwork & associates, KoreaÀÇ ¹ÚÁ¤ÈñÀÔ´Ï´Ù... 1. Àλç : ¼±»ý´ÔÀ»

Re: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) vs. AC_PACKAGE_*

2002-02-04 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> But I think, the actual cause for this issue is something different: Ralf> 3) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) allows config-headers to be Ralf> exported, ie. to export and thereby globally store configuration Ralf> information. Ralf

AM_CONDITIONAL and += macros

2002-02-04 Thread Jean-Bernard Delva
Why is it that using '+=' inside an 'if' with automake causes errors? Here is an example makefile.am illustrating the offending behavior: DUMMY = a if SOME_CONDITION DUMMY += b endif --- This prompts automake to produce the following error: Makefile.am:1: DUMMY was already defined in condition

RE: How to trigger actions after recursing in directories...

2002-02-04 Thread Daniel Shane
> Daniel> I have a recursive automake installation and I would like to > Daniel> have make go into each subdirectory and execute some code > Daniel> before and after the recursion. Is this possible with > Daniel> automake? > > I don't think it is possible. > Why do you need this? > > Tom > I

COPYING.LIB in GNITS mode?

2002-02-04 Thread Bonzini Paolo
I found that the old rule in automake 1.4 that COPYING.LIB is prohibited in GNITS mode is not enforced anymore. The explanation in the manual was wrong: the LGPL is not considered a failed experiment tout court, but the newer denomination Lesser GPL and the newer file name COPYING.LESSER should b

Re: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) vs. AC_PACKAGE_*

2002-02-04 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Am Mon, 2002-02-04 um 10.31 schrieb Akim Demaille: > > | >>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Ralf> Hi, > | Ralf> Using the new AC_INIT syntax breaks AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) > | Ralf> rsp. its triple-argument form AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(,,no): > | > | Ralf> Given suc

Re: Trying to install automake-1.5d to verify bug fixes...

2002-02-04 Thread Αλέξανδρος Καρυπίδης (Alexandros Karypidis)
> I just installed automake-1.5d to check and verify for you that the couple > of bugs I came across in 1.4 have really been fixed 1.5. When I try to run > > "aclocal" from automake 1.5, I get the following error: > > aclocal > > aclocal: configure.in: 8: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in libr

Re: Newbie: Automake installation directories

2002-02-04 Thread Αλέξανδρος Καρυπίδης (Alexandros Karypidis)
> &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr;> nobase_include_HEADERS = sampleprocject/header1.h > sampleproject2.h > > &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr;> but then automake fails with: > > &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr;> src/Makefile.am:8: in

Re: Trying to install automake-1.5d to verify bug fixes...

2002-02-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr;, >>> "&Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr;" == &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr; &Kgr;&agr;&rgr;&ugr;&pgr;&iacgr;&dgr;&eegr;&sfgr; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dg

Support for Objective-C[++]

2002-02-04 Thread F J Franklin
I'd like to add in support for Objective-C (*.m) and Objective-C++ (*.mm). I know about the work-around using the suffix rule, but it doesn't handle dependencies... Without having looked in any detail at automake, I'm guessing I may have to add support into libtool (possibly even autoconf) as wel

Trying to install automake-1.5d to verify bug fixes...

2002-02-04 Thread Αλέξανδρος Καρυπίδης (Alexandros Karypidis)
Hello Tom, Alexandre & all, I just installed automake-1.5d to check and verify for you that the couple of bugs I came across in 1.4 have really been fixed 1.5. When I try to run "aclocal" from automake 1.5, I get the following error: > aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 8: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL'

Re: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) vs. AC_PACKAGE_*

2002-02-04 Thread Akim Demaille
| >>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ralf> Hi, | Ralf> Using the new AC_INIT syntax breaks AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) | Ralf> rsp. its triple-argument form AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(,,no): | | Ralf> Given such kind of configure.ac | Ralf> [..] | Ralf> AC_INIT([foo],[0.1]

Re: AC_INIT translates PACKAGE to lower case

2002-02-04 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> Automake used PACKAGE with a specific meaning for years. It is Tom> unfortunate that Autoconf has chosen to use the same name with a Tom> different meaning. But I don't wish to belab

Re: Newbie: "undefined reference" error; cannot link to existinglibrary

2002-02-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "platter" == platter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: platter> Hello all, Hi, platter> Any help on this would be very much appreciated as I platter> am completely stuck. I guess you will get more answers if you ask the libtool mailing list instead. [...] platter> [jks@saba newsmdi]$ gcc

Re: Newbie: "undefined reference" error; cannot link to existing library

2002-02-04 Thread Αλέξανδρος Καρυπίδης (Alexandros Karypidis)
> Hello all, > > Any help on this would be very much appreciated as I am completely stuck. > > I am having trouble repackaging a shared library using the Automake, > libtool, and Autoconf. I have been able to successfully build a > distribution that installs the shared library correctly, but when

Re: Newbie: Automake installation directories

2002-02-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "&Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr;" == &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr; &Kgr;&agr;&rgr;&ugr;&pgr;&iacgr;&dgr;&eegr;&sfgr; (Alexandros Karypidis) writes: [...] &Agr;&lgr;&eacgr;&xgr;&agr;&ngr;&dgr;&rgr;&ogr;&sfgr;> nobase_include_HEADERS = sampleprocj

Re: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) vs. AC_PACKAGE_*

2002-02-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> Hi, Ralf> Using the new AC_INIT syntax breaks AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-define]) Ralf> rsp. its triple-argument form AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(,,no): Ralf> Given such kind of configure.ac Ralf> [..] Ralf> AC_INIT([foo],[0.1],[[EMAIL PROTECT