Re: Extending automake syntax

2001-12-31 Thread Erik Walthinsen
On 31 Dec 2001, Tom Tromey wrote: > Erik> lib_SLLIBRARIES = libaverage.sl > > Erik> libaverage_sl_SOURCES = \ > Erik> average_c.c \ > Erik> average_mmx.c \ > Erik> average_sse.c \ > Erik> average_altivec.c > > You can't accom

Re: make check vs make installcheck

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Simon" == Simon Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> I also notice that automake generates an 'installcheck' target, Simon> but it's not described in the documentation. Automake's user docs are nonexistent :-(. This is described in the GNU Coding Standards. Really it would be nice

Re: Cannot add a new file extension

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Mikhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I didn't see a reply to this. Dmitry> Assume that we have a language called K. The source files *.k Dmitry> are compiled using a compiler called 'kc'. This project has a Dmitry> single source file 'file.k' and I want to use autotools fo

Re: how to turn off OBJC?

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Dan" == mcmahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sorry for the delay in my reply. Dan> I'm doing some stuff where i really need to use the '.m' suffix, Dan> but its not for objective-C. automake says: Dan> automake: mex-wcalc/Makefile.am: Objective C source seen but `OBJC' not Dan> defined

Re: My current work and a silly idea

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [ Reply to some old email ... ] Akim> Why do we Akim> if FOO Akim> FOO = foo Akim> endif Akim> => Akim> @FOO_TRUE@FOO = foo Akim> instead of Akim> $(FOO_TRUE)FOO = foo Akim> and leave a plain AC_SUBST definition of FOO_TRUE? That way, Akim> rea

Re: Extending automake syntax

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Erik" == Erik Walthinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sorry for the delay in my reply. Erik> I'm working on a project where I want to create a new class of Erik> vars for automake, which will include rules which will turn into Erik> both generated source targets, and normal libtool libs.

Re: Compiling

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> ">" == Srinivas Cheruku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I have downloaded dejagnu-1.4.2. I have done >> Making check in libdejagnu >> mksh: Fatal error in reader: = missing from replacement macro reference I have no idea why this might happen, sorry. You'd probably have to ask on the dejag

Re: strip facility

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jared" == Jared Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> It's a bug that install-strip doesn't do that. Can you try Alexandre> this patch? Jared> Ok, I've upgraded to automake 1.5 and the patch works great! Alexandre, could you check the patch in? Thanks. Jared> Out of curiosity -

Re: transform problem with 1.5?

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> The Makefiles generated by automake-1.5 have a "transform" Harlan> definition that ends with a semicolon followed by a space, and Harlan> the stock sed on FreeBSD-4 hates this (at least somewhere in Harlan> the install target rule

transform problem with 1.5?

2001-12-31 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm noticing a problem with automake-1.5 and the transform rule. Specifically, I'm working with CVS amanda-2 and the --with-suffix option The Makefiles generated by automake-1.5 have a "transform" definition that ends with a semicolon followed by a space, and the stock sed on FreeBSD-4 hates thi

Re: strip facility

2001-12-31 Thread Jared Davis
On Friday 28 December 2001 02:22 am, you wrote: > It's a bug that install-strip doesn't do that. Can you try > this patch? Ok, I've upgraded to automake 1.5 and the patch works great! My library's install now takes very little space compared to before. Out of curiosity - -is there a way that

Re: automake & GNUmakefile

2001-12-31 Thread F J Franklin
On 30 Dec 2001, Tom Tromey wrote: > F.J.> Hi, I notice automake still assumes that makefiles are called > F.J.> "Makefile" (see depout.m4, lines 27-28) and not "GNUmakefile". > I ran into this problem in a different context, and I checked in a > more general fix for it. v. cool, thanks. Happy Ne