Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Can't you simply write a Make rule that will produce .info file
[...]
> Am I missing something?
Yes. :-( Without endlessly convoluted change (dependency) checks,
the docs get rebuilt causing the .info to be rebuilt causing distcheck
to choke. So, without distcheck chan
> From: Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 02:25:35 -0800
>
> 1. A package builder may not have "makeinfo"
> 2. "make distcheck" assumes that it should never need to
> rebuild the .info, even if it reconstructs the .texi.
> (So it errors-out by failing to ``rm'' the
Hi,
For years I have been maintaining this tool that extracts its own
documentation. Projects that use Doxygen and Java doc tools have
basically the same issue. The problem is that the "makeinfo" stuff
makes the erroneous assumption that mumble.texi is a source document.
>From that bad assumpt
Hi,
I am new to automake and autoconf. I have download autoconf-2.13, automake
1.5 and m4-1.4 and tried compiling it on Solaris 5.6 with gcc version 2.95.3
20010315 (release).
i compiled autoconf-2.13 by giving
$./configure
$make
$make check
# make check
rootme=`pwd`; srcrootme=`cd .; pwd`; \
te
