> >>> "Marko" == Marko Mlinar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> Marko> The problem is, each test should be compiled with different
defines
> [...]
> Marko> Basically I would need something like prog_CFLAGS.
>
> I think something like this should work:
>
> TESTS = foo bar ...
> EXTRA_PROGRAMS
Am using autoconf-2.5.2, automake-1.4b, libtool-1.4b
on an ix86 box run running Suse Linux with kernel-2.4.6.
My Makefile.am contains the following snippets:
libhrnet_la_SOURCES = \
ascbin.cc \
allocate.cc \
fileio.cc \
forward.cc \
initall.
Many thanks, yes, aclocal helped. I admit to reading that section a number
of times, but not appreciating it until now.
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandre Duret-Lutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Geoff Quelch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: Subd
>>> "G" == G E Quelch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
G> I am having trouble constructing the files needed by autoconf and/or
G> automake to construct a sub directory build environment. My main
G> directory has no source, but several subdirectories have.
G> I have the following configure.in:
G
>>> "Marko" == Marko Mlinar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Marko> The problem is, each test should be compiled with different defines
[...]
Marko> Basically I would need something like prog_CFLAGS.
I think something like this should work:
TESTS = foo bar ...
EXTRA_PROGRAMS = foo bar ...
foo
Hi!
I am trying to make automated testbench using autoconf & automake.
The problem is, each test should be compiled with different defines (e.g.
using -D
commandline parameter to gcc). Is it possible to do this? I was not able to
find this
in the manual.
Basically I would need something like pr