Re: Automake 1.5 - depcomp not added to DIST_COMMON

2001-11-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Akim> Given that this is the most important complaint against Automake, Akim> please install it. And NEWS it :P Ok. I'm including Pavel's test too. Here is what I'll commit once `make check' is finished. Index: ChangeLog ==

Re: Automake 1.5 - depcomp not added to DIST_COMMON

2001-11-09 Thread Akim Demaille
> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adl> 2001-09-22 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adl>Fix for distcommon2.test: * automake.in adl> (automake_needs_to_reprocess_all_files): New variable. ("main"): adl> Process all Makefiles a second time if adl> $automa

Re: stamp-h* and make distcheck

2001-11-09 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> So, on one hand, your recommendation in this particular case Ralf> means voiding one of the features of automake >= 1.5, for me, Ralf> OTOH - "It's only make distcheck" ;) Then another recommendation would be: add include/stamp-h t

Re: stamp-h* and make distcheck

2001-11-09 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Am Don, 2001-11-08 um 17.56 schrieb Akim Demaille: > > "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ralf> If using AM_CONFIG_HEADERS located in subdirectories, make > Ralf> distcheck breaks because of not correctly handling stamp*-files. > > Ralf> .. make[1]: Leaving directory

±âÀûÀÇ ¿µ¾î

2001-11-09 Thread º»¿µ»ç
Title: À̸ÞÀϹ®¼­  ´ÙÀ½Àº ¿µ¾î±³À°°³Çõ ÇùȸÀÇ ¹ßÇ¥¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.   ¿µ¾î±³À°°³ÇõÇùȸ¿¡¼­ ¾È³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¡¶1¡· ÆóÁöµÇ´Â ¿µ¹®¹ý 80% 25°³Ç× - »ó¼¼È÷ º¸±â-Ŭ¸¯  ¿µ¹®¹ý 80%ÀÇ ÆóÁö´Â À§ ÇùȸÀÇ ÁÖµµ·Î

±âÀûÀÇ ¿µ¾î

2001-11-09 Thread º»¿µ»ç
Title: À̸ÞÀϹ®¼­  ´ÙÀ½Àº ¿µ¾î±³À°°³Çõ ÇùȸÀÇ ¹ßÇ¥¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.   ¿µ¾î±³À°°³ÇõÇùȸ¿¡¼­ ¾È³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¡¶1¡· ÆóÁöµÇ´Â ¿µ¹®¹ý 80% 25°³Ç× - »ó¼¼È÷ º¸±â-Ŭ¸¯  ¿µ¹®¹ý 80%ÀÇ ÆóÁö´Â À§ ÇùȸÀÇ ÁÖµµ·Î