> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> 3. Because of a stupidity in Tru64 make, automake displays
>an error message if comments are found immediately after
> the tab (plus
>zero/more whitespace). I think perhaps a nicer approach
> would
Title: Untitled
¸ðÁý±â°£ : 9¿ù 3ÀÏ~9¿ù
20ÀÏ
°³° : 9¿ù 24ÀÏ /
±³À°½Ã°£ : 9 : 00 ~ 18 :
00 (¿ù~±Ý) "Ãѱ³À°±â°£ 640½Ã°£-4°³¿ù"
Áö¿øÀÚ°Ý : °íÁ¹,´ëÁ¹ ¹ÌÃë¾÷ÀÚ(ÀçÇлý
Áß Á¹¾÷¿¹Á¤ÀÚ Æ÷ÇÔ) ¶Ç´Â ½Ç¾÷ÀÚ¡ØÀÚ°ÝÁ¦ÇÑ : 2001³âµµ¿¡ ŸºÎó°¡ ¼öÇàÁßÀÎ
If automake doesn't recognise a line in a Makefile.am, it assumes that it
is the continuation of a Makefile rule.
In having a look at the code, I think there are a few problems with the way
this is handled, particularly with regards to the handling of comments.
1. If an umatched line continues
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä. »çÀü¿¡ Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»°Ô µÇ¾î Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅÍ³Ý °Ô½ÃÆÇ, ¹æ¸í·Ï µî¿¡ ¿Ã¸° ±Û¿¡ Ç¥½ÃµÈ °Í°ú
ÀÎÅÍ³Ý»ó¿¡ °ø°³µÈ °Í µîÀ» ¹«ÀÛÀ§·Î ¸ðÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸ ħÇØ¿Í´Â ¹«°üÇÕ´Ï´Ù.°Ç°°ü¸®¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Àü´ÞÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ß¼ÛµÈ
°ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
Å×·
It looks like Something is creating a file called .deps/*.Po, and there are
apparently some native "make" implementations that Really Hate this.
I've noticed it for a While, and it's still happening with automake 1.5 .
Thoughts/suggestions?
H
Hi,
I'm hoping someone could give me an example of how to build java
sources into binaries with gcj and gcj. I've read the automake
manual, and it has been helpful in getting me as far as I am now, but
I can't seem to put it all together. I'm using automake from cvs from
about a week ago.
I h
> "Steven" == Steven G Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steven> I really like the autogen.sh file that comes with most GNOME
Steven> programs, and steal it for many of my own programs. This sort
Steven> of thing is quite useful for people using tools like automake
Steven> and autoconf.
S
> I really like the autogen.sh file that comes with most GNOME
> programs, and
> steal it for many of my own programs. This sort of thing is
> quite useful
> for people using tools like automake and autoconf.
>
> Has there been any consideration of putting together a
> "standard" autogen.sh sc
