> "Stephen" == Stephen Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> I want to know if this happens because argmatch.o already exists,
Tom> or if it is because the SCO `cc' doesn't like `-c' and `-o'
Tom> together.
Stephen> It appears to be the latter:
We should already have the mechanisms we ne
> "Kevin" == Kevin Dalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> Here's a slightly revised test. I removed the Makefile.am
Kevin> modification. libtool is still built by configure, but it is
Kevin> never removed. For a real life application, the libraries
Kevin> might appear in a subdirectory,
--- Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Stephen> I'm Trying to update an old SCO unixware 2 box...Currently I
> Stephen> have CVS 1.10.8 there. (Yeah, shame on me)
>
> Stephen> The cc's -o option refuses to overwrite existing .o files...:
>
[...]
> I want to know if this happens becaus
This test looks good. The test fails in 1.4f, but succeeds in the
latest CVS release. The newer version of automake also solves the
problem in findutils which I had. Thanks.
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Kevin" == Kevin Dalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Kevin> If AC_CO
Ladies & Gentlemen,
Are you ready to the experience of a lifetime ?
As affiliates of the CIL group, we offer you to PLUGIN to the largest SEX-SERVER on
the WEB, in order to get more than 3000 MegaBytes of the best and most sensational SEX
on the entire Web!
Why on earth do you think that tho
Here's a slightly revised test. I removed the Makefile.am
modification. libtool is still built by configure, but it is never
removed. For a real life application, the libraries might appear in a
subdirectory, rather than in the top level directory. Since
lib_LTLIBRARIES is not necessary for cr
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:55:32PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
: > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Lars> That way I could run aclocal without having to remember the dirs
: Lars> or wrap the invocation in a script (aclocal scans configure.ac
: Lars> anyways).
:
: You can use AC
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:49:35PM -0500, Raja R Harinath wrote:
> So, I think it's cleaner to do:
>
> 1. conditions_true_when(\@@) -- takes a list of conditions and one
> or more "whens", and returns true when all conditions are true
> for all whens.
>
> 2. redundant_condition($@)