Re: @_am_include@ problem

2001-03-10 Thread Harlan Stenn
I fixed the problem by totally removing /usr/local/share/auto{make,conf} and re-running the auto* installation. I expect this is something that a number of future folks are going to get bitten by... H

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-10 Thread edward
the fix for pr19.test i posted is not intended to *fix* the test. rather, it is meant for it to fail for the *same* reasons on any other platform that uses gnu make, as opposed to failing because of a cygwin thing. gnu make will remove intermediate targets, so make dist fails because foo.c is an

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-10 Thread Robert Collins
Well I've carried on and tested the CVS automake on by openBSD box, to see if the issues were cygwin-specific, or broken in automake CVS. on openBSD, only the subdirbuiltsources.test PASSed of the 3 I reported as failing on cygwin. So I suspect that pr19 & 87 are broken across the board. You

automake updates (was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates)

2001-03-10 Thread edward
so, automake now behaves as well as could be expected. i've enclosed unified diffs of all my cumulative changes against stock cvs automake as attachments. still a couple of outstanding issues, but it's getting darn close. you get 1) exe exec fix (remove exe everywhere and put it in where needed (

Re: 13-single-var-storage.patch

2001-03-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Mar 9, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I should have built a independent automake.in to reconstruct a > cleaner patch, sorry. Ever heard of interdiff? http://people.redhat.com/twaugh/ftp/interdiff/stable/ -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~o

Re: 21-fix-cond3.patch

2001-03-10 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:48:05AM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote: : This is the bug reported by Lars. Thanks, it did the trick... Lars J -- Innovation is one percent inspiration and ninetynine percent perspiration, and in my case; twice that... -- Norville Barnes, `The Hudsucker Proxy'

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-10 Thread Robert Collins
Thanks edward, when I started looking into those, I read somewhere in the automake pages, that the XFAIL results, are "expected fails", so only the FAIL: pr87.test FAIL: subdirbuiltsources.test Still need to be looked at. Sorry for the slight misdirection. Rob - Original Message -

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-10 Thread edward
- Original Message - From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 5:14 AM Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates > Hi edward, > I'm not sure whether you want blow by blow bug reports, or a >

21-fix-cond3.patch

2001-03-10 Thread Akim Demaille
This is the bug reported by Lars. Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in (&variable_conditions_permutations): Separate the conditions. * tests/cond3.test: Improve the sed expression. Index: automake.in --- automake.in Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:

@_am_include@ problem

2001-03-10 Thread Harlan Stenn
I did a cvs update of the latest automake and autoconf tonight. I have one generated Makefile that now contains several lines of the form: @_am_include@ $(DEPDIR)/foo.Po I'm pretty sure I did a clean build/install of these versions of automake and autoconf. I did an "autoreconf -f" in the top