Re: 07-use-w.patch

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> As a first step, I can apply this patch *but* with this part and Akim> the --Werror part in defs. I don't see a `defs' change here. Akim> * automake.in: Use -w. Akim> Normalize all use of `$lang . '-foo'' into `"$lang-foo"'. Ak

Re: Conditionals in Makefile

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> i understood my question was stupid: the order does not matter, Akim> because if it's a rule, then it amkes no sense (hence is Akim> forbidden) to have two equivalent conditions (actually one being Akim> provalbe by the other is enough) or i

Re: Conditionals in Makefile

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> The question can be asked as ``how should be output conditionals Akim> in Makfiles: the order does not matter, hence alphabetical is Akim> fine, or order matters''. If you mean the output of the `@FOO_TRUE@' leaders on a given line, then th

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Stephan" == Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Maybe we could convince the GNU sysadmins to turn on spam blocking. Stephan> Speaking as mail admin for @kde.org I can only tell you that Stephan> this is impossible. I disagree. On sources.redhat.com we run lots of spam blocking.

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Stephan Kulow
Tom Tromey wrote: > > > "Allan" == Allan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup > Allan> grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that > Allan> requires that all posters are members of the list. > > We can't mov

Re: FYI: `make distcheck' non-interactive again

2001-03-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Tom! > Pavel> `make distcheck' is working again. No more questions from `rm'. > > Thanks. > BTW this is the sort of thing that we can check for in > `maintainer-check'. That way we can easily find out if we've > accidentally written a new test that will break. I don't know if `maintainer

Re: Conditionals in Makefile

2001-03-07 Thread akim
> If the order does not matter, then sorting it can simplify a lot from > the code: simplify sort the conditions, that makes a uniq means to > designates them (conditional_same makes no sense, use eq, etc.). > The backdraw is that the user cannot see in the Makefile something > which is related to

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Allan" == Allan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup Allan> grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that Allan> requires that all posters are members of the list. We can't move the list. Maybe we could convinc

Conditionals in Makefile

2001-03-07 Thread akim
There is a choice to make wrt conditionals, and I'd like to have your opinion as both choices can be defended with sensible arguments. The question can be asked as ``how should be output conditionals in Makfiles: the order does not matter, hence alphabetical is fine, or order matters''. If the

Re: 07-use-w.patch

2001-03-07 Thread Akim Demaille
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As a first step, I can apply this patch *but* with this part and the > --Werror part in defs. Then we have -w in automake, the bad uses are > fixed (at least those triggered by the test suite and the fileutils), > the only thing is that the test suite

Re: PATCH 2/2: Unconditional use of install-sh for install-strip (Re: cross-install-strip summary)

2001-03-07 Thread Akim Demaille
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure this is the right place to document this. > > 2001-03-06 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * automake.texi (Requirements): Document the use of the STRIP > variable in cross-compilation environments. I'm no

Re: 08-perl-is-not-sh.patch

2001-03-07 Thread Akim Demaille
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> * You didn't update aclocal.in as requested by the comment near > >> %obsolete_macros > > Akim> Didn't notice it. That's just for style, or it introduces a > Akim> functional difference? >

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Allan Clark
One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that requires that all posters are members of the list. Invites may be required. Or... GNU could extend their mailinglists to require authentication on their website and membership

Re: How do I build debug versions?

2001-03-07 Thread Guido Draheim
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > >>> "Dean" == Dean Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Dean> Another thing you could do is make multiple build directories > Dean> and always make in a certain way in them. In other words, you > Dean> could: > > Dean> mkdir debug-build opt-build

Re: How do I build debug versions?

2001-03-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Dean" == Dean Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Dean> Another thing you could do is make multiple build directories Dean> and always make in a certain way in them. In other words, you Dean> could: Dean> mkdir debug-build opt-build Dean> cd debug-build; $top_srcdir/configure; ma

Re: How do I build debug versions?

2001-03-07 Thread Dean Hoover
Shameek Basu wrote: [snip HTML stuff] I am also a newbie at this. I've "solved" a small portion of your problem, with some help from others on this list. Here's what I'd do. in your top level Makefile.am file, add a target: debug: $(MAKE) all "CXXFLAGS=-g -DDEBUG" now, if you want to have

Re: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

2001-03-07 Thread John Poltorak
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 06:36:54PM +0900, Äھư¡±¸ wrote: Can someone stop this spam getting in here? -- John

»ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

2001-03-07 Thread Äھư¡±¸
Title: KOA Office System(ÄھƽýºÅÛ)--»ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸¿¡¼­ ÀÎÅ׸®¾î °ø»ç±îÁö... Àü¹® ¼îÇθô--   automake´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä. »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθô Äھư¡±¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.      ¡í ¹«·á¹è¼Û&¼³Ä¡(ÀϺÎÁö¿ªÁ¦¿Ü)  ¡í ¹«·á ·¹À̾ƿô&°ßÀû ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø

PATCH 2/2: Unconditional use of install-sh for install-strip (Re: cross-install-strip summary)

2001-03-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
I'm not sure this is the right place to document this. 2001-03-06 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.texi (Requirements): Document the use of the STRIP variable in cross-compilation environments. diff -ru ../automake-1.4e-2001-02-27/automake.texi ./automake.te

PATCH 1/2: Unconditional use of install-sh for install-strip (Re: cross-install-strip summary)

2001-03-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
2001-03-06 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * install.am (install-strip): Set INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV if STRIP is not empty. * m4/strip.m4 (AM_PROG_INSTALL_STRIP): Set INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM to install-sh unconditionally. Don't set INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM_ENV.