> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I believe everything should be in order (I believe I filled out
Lars> for Automake and maybe even Libtool when I did it for Autoconf).
Yeah, I found the info.
Lars> Anyways, the patch should be reworked to use a &canonicalize()
Lars>
> "Emil" == Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Emil> My particular interest is that I'm writing a wrapper program in
Emil> C that changes based on a preprocessor define. I'd like to be
Emil> able to do something like:
Emil> bin_PROGRAMS = prog1 prog2
Emil> prog1_SOURCES = prog.c
Emil> pro
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm... shouldn't we print all the copyright years here?
>> And in aclocal?
Akim> No idea, you are the Boss :)
That's cheating! What does autoconf do?
Maybe we need to ask RMS.
Tom
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Sorry, I lost track from Tom's message about this.
Akim> No changes at all.
Akim> * automake.in (&file_contents): Remove a dead branch.
Thanks.
Tom
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Here is the version I'm applying. The changes Tom noted were
Akim> due to my writing $pair instead of $pairs. I hope some day we
Akim> really use strict... And prototypes, which will require a lot
Akim> of massage, since it means
Sorry, I lost track from Tom's message about this.
No changes at all.
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* automake.in (&file_contents): Remove a dead branch.
Index: automake.in
--- automake.in Fri, 09 Feb 2001 04:37:00 +0100 akim (am/f/39_automa
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do like the patch. But I'd like these things to be fixed before you
> check it in.
Here is what I checked in. Thanks for noticing!
--
Here is the version I'm applying. The changes
On Feb 8, 2001, "Florent. Devin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I make a Makefile based on automake to be conditionnal
> at make time and not at configure time.
Basically, you can't. This just can't be done with portable Makefile
rules, in general.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana',
On Feb 9, 2001, Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> prog1_SOURCES = prog.c
> prog1_CFLAGS = -DPROG_NAME=\"prog1\"
> prog2_SOURCES = prog.c
> prog2_CFLAGS = -DPROG_NAME=\"prog2\"
This should work with CVS automake.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Akim> This patch includes the Makefile.ins' diffs, i.e., no changes.
>
> Umm, there are plenty of Makefile.in changes here.
Right, and a lot of thanks for reviewing them into the details!
> Some are whitespace changes, which I'd prefer not to change:
>
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Akim> - print "Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n";
> Akim> + print "Copyright 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n";
>
> Hmm... shouldn't we print all the copyright years here?
> And in aclocal?
No idea, you are t
Changelog from CVS HEAD shows that as of Mar 1999, the above options
were removed. Found out the hard way working with CVS autoconf -).
Anyway, build-dir is indeed gone from automake.in, however include-deps
is still present in automake.in.
Along the same lines, both options are still listed in
Akim --
This line appears twice in the big `if' in &file_contents:
elsif (/$RULE_PATTERN/mso)
What gives? This can't be right.
If the second branch should still live could you add a comment
explaining what case it is for?
Tom
On 8 Feb 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Emil" == Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Emil> What is the state of per-object cflags in automake? Is anyone
> Emil> working on them? If not, how difficult would it be to implement
> Emil> it?
>
> What do you mean by `object'?
Sorry, I took
>> I added another test to pr87.test to check for this failure.
Pavel> I have fixed it so that it fails "correctly", not because
Pavel> foo/Makefile.in is tested before being created :-)
Duh, thanks. Sometimes I think it is amazing that automake does
anything at all.
Tom
Hello, Tom!
> I added another test to pr87.test to check for this failure.
I have fixed it so that it fails "correctly", not because foo/Makefile.in
is tested before being created :-)
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--- ChangeLog
+++ ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2001-02-08
> "Emil" == Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Emil> What is the state of per-object cflags in automake? Is anyone
Emil> working on them? If not, how difficult would it be to implement
Emil> it?
What do you mean by `object'?
We have per-executable and per-library flag support in the mos
On Feb 8, 2001, Tomas Berndtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My autoconf version is 2.13. m4 is GNU m4 1.4.
> I have the following in my configure.in:
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(dlopen, , AC_CHECK_LIB(dl,dlopen, ,
> [AC_MSG_ERROR([
> *** Zen does not function properly without dlopen, sorry.])]))
Y
Hello,
What is the state of per-object cflags in automake? Is anyone working on
them? If not, how difficult would it be to implement it?
Thanks,
Emil
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> When I run CVS Automake, the .c.o and .c.lo rules become like this:
Lars> | .c.o:
Lars> |
Lars> | @AMDEP@ source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
Thanks, that is definitely a bug.
I added another test to pr87.test to chec
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Is it really any point in ChangeLog entries for such small
Lars> cosmetic details?
I like to document every change.
Tom
Hi,
How can I make a Makefile based on automake to be conditionnal
at make time and not at configure time.
I have to do this in my Makefile :
ifeq "$(shell if [ -f $(DEPEND) ]; then echo EXISTS; fi)" ""
all: $(PROG)
include $(DEPEND)
else
all: depend
endif
So it requires m
When I run CVS Automake, the .c.o and .c.lo rules become like this:
| .c.o:
|
| @AMDEP@ source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
| @AMDEP@ depfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.Po' tmpdepfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.TPo' @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
| @AMDEP@ $(CCDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
| $(COMPILE) -
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:36:03PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
: > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Lars> Any point in these spaces?
:
: Nope. I checked this in.
:
: Please send a ChangeLog entry with your patches.
Is it really any point in ChangeLog entries for such smal
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:05:28AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
: > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Lars> Anyways, are the people that count looking into this patch? I'd
: Lars> prefer it if it was applied or rejected as soon as possible
: Lars> instead of waiting in the dark..
My autoconf version is 2.13. m4 is GNU m4 1.4.
I have the following in my configure.in:
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(dlopen, , AC_CHECK_LIB(dl,dlopen, ,
[AC_MSG_ERROR([
*** Zen does not function properly without dlopen, sorry.])]))
The idea is to check for dlopen, and if it's not found, check for it
in
26 matches
Mail list logo
