Re: Automake Real Millenium Beta

2000-12-23 Thread Raja R Harinath
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the real start of the new millenium deserves a new Automake as > well. > > To that end, I've updated the automake version to 1.4b and put a > release up. The cvs automake is now `1.4c'. > > There are plenty of bugs left, I'm sure. Some known iss

Automake Real Millenium Beta

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
I think the real start of the new millenium deserves a new Automake as well. To that end, I've updated the automake version to 1.4b and put a release up. The cvs automake is now `1.4c'. There are plenty of bugs left, I'm sure. Some known issues: * The documentation is not nearly up to date *

Re: [patch] libtoolize --acdir --ltdir

2000-12-23 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 23, 2000, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Rusty" == Rusty Ballinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rusty> I can only assume that everyone was stunned into silence by a Rusty> rush of euphoria and love at my suggestion to add --acdir and Rusty> --ltdir arguments to automake & lib

Re: Automake suffixes ordering [patch]

2000-12-23 Thread Kevin Ryde
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Kevin> I find though that I got it wrong for the case where automake > Kevin> isn't automatically generating any suffixes, but rather there's > Kevin> only user-supplied ones with $(SUFFIXES).

Re: cleaning in conditional subdirs

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Steve" == Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> [Apologies if this has been covered before -- I couldn't figure Steve> out how to search the list archives at Steve> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/automake.] I don't know that either. However there is another archive which

Re: [patch] libtoolize --acdir --ltdir

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Rusty" == Rusty Ballinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rusty> I can only assume that everyone was stunned into silence by a Rusty> rush of euphoria and love at my suggestion to add --acdir and Rusty> --ltdir arguments to automake & libtoolize, so here's a patch. I haven't been reading or r

Re: [patch] noinst_JAVA

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Rusty" == Rusty Ballinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rusty> Hey, a thing that's bothered me for a while is that noinst_JAVA Rusty> is broken. Thanks, I checked in your patch. Rusty> (The reason for this test is that the install rule in java.am Rusty> installs *.class; in Todd's case, fo

Re: libs in subdirs

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Bryan" == Bryan VanDeVen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It's called creating `convenience libraries'. Check the docs. Bryan> So, if there is a way to do this without libtool, please point Bryan> me in the direction of the relevant doc and I will be more than Bryan> happy to read it. The

Re: Default clean files

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Derek> Here's a patch that subtracts any generated files listed in Derek> EXTRA_DIST from the mostlyclean-aminfo targets and adds them to Derek> the maintainer-clean-aminfo targets. It seems to me that this Derek> might be more generaliz

Re: [Fwd: --add-missing]

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
Derek> I slogged my way through enough FAQs, documentation, and email Derek> archives to lead me to believe that having the same *.texi file Derek> find two different texinfo.tex files (say ./texinfo.tex & Derek> ./pdftexinfo.tex) depending on the output isn't a common Derek> request. I sent out