Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It wasn't depot -- I forgot all about that one. So there's still one > more out there. There are at least five or six of them that I've heard about, and a new one seems to show up at every LISA. Sometimes two. Plus some of us have rolled our own. --

All Orders

2000-05-10 Thread Darrel Vanski
WE MAKE IT EASY & AFFORDABLE TO ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS FOR YOUR BUSINESS INTERNET (Auction Vendors & Online Mall Stores Too!) STOREFRONT OR MAIL ORDER MERCHANTS WE SPECIALIZE IN APPROVING YOU! APPLY TODAY AND START FOR JUST $9.95! FREE APPLICATION!! FREE PROGRAMMING!! DON'T LOS

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Morten Eriksen
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [about making it possible to set PACKAGE] > We could add it, but it doesn't seem that useful in general. It'd be nice to be able to name ``libmyfancylib'' as ``libmyfancylibdbg'' depending on a --disable-debug option to configue, for instance, to make it po

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Morten Eriksen
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tom> There are a few tools like this. GNU stow is one. There is at least > tom> one other one whose name I forgot. > > Paul> I think you're thinking of depot. > > It wasn't depot -- I forgot all about that one. So there's still > one more out there.

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
Perhaps you're thinking of "slink" (http://conbrio.eecs.tufts.edu/~couch/Slink/slink.html)? -Original Message- From: Tom Tromey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tom Tromey; Masterson, David; 'Jean-Marc Lasgouttes'; [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: tom> There are a few tools like this. GNU stow is one. There is at least tom> one other one whose name I forgot. I think you're thinking of depot. -- --- Paul D. Smith <

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
tom> There are a few tools like this. GNU stow is one. There is at least tom> one other one whose name I forgot. Paul> I think you're thinking of depot. It wasn't depot -- I forgot all about that one. So there's still one more out there. Tom

Default $CPP is not gcc

2000-05-10 Thread Michael Bletzinger
Hi There, I'm using the CVS autoconf updated yesterday (from the right repository this time :-)). autoconf picks "gcc" as the compiler and "cc -E" as the preprocessor when I do not specify CC or CPP. This causes a problem on my machine which is: SunOS pecos.ncsa.uiuc.edu 5.7 Generic_106541-07 s

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
I looked at Stow about the time I found Pkglink. Both seemed to have their plusses and minuses. I shied away from Stow because of what it mentioned in its documentation about conflicts (http://www.gnu.org/software/stow/manual.html#SEC13) and that, ultimately, the feature of splitting seemed to

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm starting to use "modules" to handle this problem; one installs software in, say, /opt/pkg/@PACKAGE@/@VERSION@/ and then updates a small file in, say, /opt/modules/modulfiles/@PACKAGE@/@VERSION@ (this is a file, not a directory), and then the "modules" script handles setting up the PATH, MANPAT

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "Masterson, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: md> If you want, I have a Perl tool that I picked up and enhanced md> called PKGLINK that could help with this. Basically, with md> pkglink, you install all packages in there own prefix directory md> and then use pkglink to symbolically l

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "David" == Masterson, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> If you want, I have a Perl tool that I picked up and enhanced David> called PKGLINK that could help with this. Basically, with David> pkglink, you install all packages in there own prefix directory David> and then use pkglink t

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> What I mean is that I am ready to provide a more "standard" way JMarc> of installing several LyX versions concurrently, but does this JMarc> standard way exist? Tom> Most

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
If you want, I have a Perl tool that I picked up and enhanced called PKGLINK that could help with this. Basically, with pkglink, you install all packages in there own prefix directory and then use pkglink to symbolically link the default version you want to publish into /usr/local (or someplace s

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
I do it by something like: configure --prefix=/packages/lyx/lyx- make make install -Original Message- From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 9:01 AM To: Tom Tromey Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configur

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> If you look you'll find that gcc and emacs are basically the only Tom> GNU tools that do this. This feature isn't specified by the GNU Tom> standards, and wasn't in wide use as I wrote automake. So there Tom> didn't seem to be much reason

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "JMarc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> Well, at my site we have gcc-2.8.1 _and_ gcc-2.95.2, JMarc> emacs-19.34 _and_ emacs-20.2, etc. I thought this was a kind of JMarc> feature of some GNU tools. Is this way of fdoing things JMarc> deprecated? A different --pref

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> What I mean is that I am ready to provide a more "standard" way JMarc> of installing several LyX versions concurrently, but does this JMarc> standard way exist? Tom> Most people just make a new --prefix. Well, at my site we have gcc-2

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
JMarc> Thanks for the tip. Does it mean that what I am trying to do is JMarc> not a good idea, or that automake is lacking a feature? I'm not sure it is either of these. JMarc> What I mean is that I am ready to provide a more "standard" way JMarc> of installing several LyX versions concurrently,

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "JMarc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> With autoconf, since I want to use the autogenerated makefile JMarc> rules, I figured out that setting PACKAGE to the right value at JMarc> configure time should work. Un

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "JMarc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> With autoconf, since I want to use the autogenerated makefile JMarc> rules, I figured out that setting PACKAGE to the right value at JMarc> configure time should work. Unfortunately, I cannot get the JMarc> name of the insta

Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hello, I maintain the configure.in script for LyX and since we have switched to automake, there is a piece of functionality I cannot get back into my script. Basically, we used to have an option allowing to install the binary as (for example) ${prefix}/bin/lyx-devel and the data as ${prefix