This patch adds the ability to use partial $(wildcard *.h) (GNU?)
make-style syntax in automake variable declarations. It is useful for
projects where the files for each target are are organised in a single
directory.
Example -
banana_SOURCES = fridge.app $(wildcard *.tree)
banana_SOUR
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:52:32 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> Executing a shell script does use a bit more memory, but only just
|> enough for "/bin/sh" and the name of the script to execute. If that
|> is pushing H.J. over the memory limit, then he must have b
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 02:11:03PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Then please explain how come pexecute prints that message.
>
> I assume you're running on some Unix flavor, probably GNU/Linux, so
> the last variant of pexecute is used. The only situation in which
Yes.
> program (gcc); pro
On Mar 10, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 01:36:50PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > gcc: installation problem, cannot exec
>> > `/work/ia64/bin/cygnus/2303/gcc/collect2': Argument list
On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gcc: installation problem, cannot exec
> `/work/ia64/bin/cygnus/2303/gcc/collect2': Argument list too long
Hey! This comes up long before libtool's ld-new is ever started.
It's the gcc
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 01:36:50PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > gcc: installation problem, cannot exec
> > `/work/ia64/bin/cygnus/2303/gcc/collect2': Argument list too long
>
>
>
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> I'm still surprised by something here. The error message which
|> H.J. cites is from libiberty/pexecute.c. That means that the exec
|> which should start the shell script is failing. The case is precisely
|> identical from the point of view of gc
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 23:10:39 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800
|>From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>
|>I know this patch doesn't look very clean. But I don't
