Re: suggestion for y.tab.c vs y_tab.c

2000-02-18 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Mark" == Mark E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> Could an equivalent change be considered to automake.in so Mark> DJGPP's bison will work? While not the best solution, it's the Mark> best one I can think of until there is suitable macro in Mark> Autoconf to deal with this. I'm not famili

Re: Complete Newbie desperately seeking help...

2000-02-18 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Mike" == Mike Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> As root, I ran "tar -zxvf automake-1.4.tar.gz". I Mike> then went into the directory that was created, ran Mike> ./configure, make and then make install. Mike> When I checked the version, however, I found that I Mike> still had autom

Complete Newbie desperately seeking help...

2000-02-18 Thread Mike Reilly
Hullo -- Sorry to bother you, but I'm having a lot of trouble updating automake on my system. I recently (4 days ago) delved into Linux with Corel Linux (which I believe is built on Debian). While trying to install LICQ, I found that I needed automake 1.4 running, and all I had was 1.3. I went

suggestion for y.tab.c vs y_tab.c

2000-02-18 Thread Mark E.
Hello folks, I made this change to binutils/ld/Makefile.in so it can handle y_tab.c and y_tab.h: *** Makefile.in.origThu Dec 2 06:49:18 1999 --- Makefile.in Fri Feb 18 16:57:58 2000 *** *** 519,528 .l.c: $(LEX) $(AM_LFLAGS) $(LFLAGS) $< && mv $(LEX_OUTPUT_ROOT).c $

Re: Problem with defining a new automake target (perhaps a general make question)

2000-02-18 Thread Andrew S. Townley
Tom, Thanks very much for your help. I'll give your suggestions a shot. As for the dependency stuff, I added it because we were having some problems with the changes of the headers used by the .ec files not getting picked up. Since you reminded me that it was gcc-specific, that jogs my memory