> On 13 Nov 2022, at 05:11, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, at 4:33 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, at 4:31 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>>> Because of the concerns raised in this thread it's become clear that
>>> what's in Autoconf now is too drastic, and I've propos
[dropping non-autoconf lists from Cc]
On 2022-11-13, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I have not pushed this, and have only tested it lightly on a current Linux.
> It needs testing on weird old systems, particularly old AIX, HP-UX, MinGW.
I'd be happy to give it a go on my weird old systems ...
>
> I don
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 12:49 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2022-11-13, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> I have not pushed this, and have only tested it lightly on a current Linux.
>> It needs testing on weird old systems, particularly old AIX, HP-UX, MinGW.
>
> I'd be happy to give it a go on my weird old
On 2022-11-15, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 12:49 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
>> On 2022-11-13, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>> I have not pushed this, and have only tested it lightly on a current
>>> Linux.
>>> It needs testing on weird old systems, particularly old AIX, HP-UX,
>>> MinGW.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 2:02 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> But neither suggestion makes any difference. Timestamps seem OK; it
> appears that make is deciding to aclocal.m4 (and then configure) because
> of prerequisites that do not exist outright:
>
> % make -d
> [...]
>Considering target
