В Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:34:38 +0800, 张亚霏 написа:
> AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_PCRECPP],[test "$build_pcrecpp"="true"])
Put spaces around `=' (also for the BUILD_LIBICONV conditional).
The test for pcrecpp has to be performed with a C++ compiler, otherwise
the conditional will always be false. (You ca
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Such a comment is also more suitable in the README, since a packager
> will not read the Makefile.am.
A diligent distro package maintainer certainly reads the Makefile.am,
and also reviews the full diff between upstream releases.
___
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>A diligent distro package maintainer certainly reads the
>Makefile.am, and also reviews the full diff between upstream
>releases.
>
> Very few packages do this,
I don't think that anyone can state with reasonable certainty how many
do or do not do this. I do
Eric Blake wrote:
> I have to wonder if there are cases where rejecting extra arguments
> might not be advisable,
No, the behavior should remain the same (silently ignoring them); any
change smells like a dangerous path to follow. The only difference
would be the warnings (well, errors with -Werr
В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:01:14 -0700, Paul Eggert написа:
> On 08/23/10 10:28, John Calcote wrote:
>> What is the correct approach for this situation? Should I simply define
>> __USE_UNIX98 in my source code
>
> No, because that symbol is private to glibc. I wouldn't mess with it.
> Instead, use Aut
At Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:51:40 -0600,
Eric Blake wrote at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Does anyone know how the pig latin and sweedish chef translation
> pages were generated, or should we delete those now that they are
> out of date?
As a general rule, please don't remove translations only because
they'
В Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:55:16 -0600, Bob Proulx написа:
> I changed the headers so that replies remain in the autoconf list and
> not over at the non-public www-discuss list. That looks to have been an
> unintentional artifact of the way that message was forwarded.
OK. I replied to Eric privately
В Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:21:04 +0800, Tim Post написа:
> The GPL requires only that you make the source code available with all
> files needed to complete the build. So, in essence, you could exclude
> the things needed to rebuild the build system, but you would alienate
> anyone who is willing to he
