Hi all,
$ autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.65
I'm using the $abs_srcdir var in an m4 file included by configure.ac,
and I'm observing that $abs_srcdir is expanded to the empty string, in
both Linux and MinGW. I wonder if this is the right behavior,
according to the manual:
-- Variab
On date Thursday 2010-07-08 18:00:56 +0200, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>
> >-- Variable: srcdir
> >The name of the directory that contains the source code for that
> >makefile.
> >
> >-- Variable: abs_sr
On date Thursday 2010-07-08 18:41:48 +0200, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>
> >No, this will not work, because I need LDFLAGS to be defined during
> >configuration, ...
>
> in that case you'll have to save CFLAGS, LDFL
ich mishandles nonexistent args
# SVR4 /usr/ucb/install, which tries to use the nonexistent group "staff"
# OS/2's system install, which has a completely different semantic
# ./install, which can be erroneously created by make from ./install.sh.
So which is the right way to check for a
On date Tuesday 2007-02-13 21:02:57 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues configured this
message:
> Hello Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Sabatini wrote on Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:56:06AM CET:
> >
> > I'm trying to use autoconf for a project of mine. I would like to
> > insert a chec
file I get:
my $system_config_file= "NONE/etc/pac.conf";
What am I missing?
Another question: in the case it's possible to get this working, is it
a standard/recommended technique (I see examples using simply sed
translations in the Makefile to achieve the same effect
Hi Keith, and thanks for the fast reply!
On date Thursday 2007-03-01 13:25:42 +, Keith MARSHALL configured this
message:
> Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > I'm working on a project when I have a Perl script, call it "script",
> > which contains some installation de
On date Thursday 2007-03-01 23:15:30 +0100, Andreas Schwab configured this
message:
> Stefano Sabatini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [CUT]
> These substitutions are designed to be used in a makefile where the
> variables are recursively expanded.
>
> > Unfortunately
y to assign the
AC_PACKAGE_VERSION to an autoconfigured package?
Many thanks in advance.
Best regards.
--
Stefano Sabatini
Linux user number 337176 (see http://counter.li.org)
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
On date Friday 2007-12-14 15:56:49 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Stefano Sabatini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi all autoconfers,
> >
> > I have a package managed by SVN, and I would like to assign the
> > AC_PACKAGE_VERSION using the current SVN version
I hope to have expressed clearly the problem, sorry for the very
likely misunderstanding I'm eventually showing about
autoconf/pkg-config.
Many thanks in advance for any suggestion/idea.
Regards.
--
Stefano Sabatini
Linux user number 337
On date Tuesday 2007-12-18 18:28:30 +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> Hello Stefano,
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:40:31PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > A solution could be then to write a little test program to run during
> > configuration which uses the flags prov
On date Wednesday 2007-12-19 14:38:31 +, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:31:16AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > Just another little newbie question, am I supposed to copy the pkg.m4
> > file containing the macro somewhere into my package (e.g. in
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
