autoconf 2.59 - Syntax error in autoreconf?

2005-02-28 Thread Stan Guillory
Hello, I just upgraded our site to autoconf 2.59. I had to make a hand edit to the autoreconf perl script. I had to change line 489 from: mkdir $aux_dir or error "cannot create $aux_dir: $!"; to: mkdir $aux_dir, 755 or error "cannot create $aux_dir: $!"; That is the mkdir command

Re: autoconf 2.59 - Syntax error in autoreconf?

2005-03-01 Thread Stan Guillory
So autoconf depends on perl 5.8 then? We are using 5.0. In 5.0 it is definitely not optional. Thanks, Stan >>> Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/28/2005 4:57:31 PM >>> "Stan Guillory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That is the mkdir command

Problem with shared libraries on Solaris 8

2005-03-01 Thread Stan Guillory
I have just upgraded to Autoconf 2.59, Automake 1.95, and Libtool 1.5.14. Now when I build shared libraries, they don't have the .so extension in thier names. Anybody know why? It may be a question for the libtool list, but I thought I try both places. Stan >>> Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <[EMAIL

Using Purify in AutoConf builds

2005-04-14 Thread Stan Guillory
Has anyone had any experience using purify with autoconf based c++ builds. Any caveats? Any tips? Thanks, Stanford S. Guillory Systems Engineer Southwest Airlines 214-792-6136 ___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li

RE: autoconf and STL

2005-06-21 Thread Stan Guillory
___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH does not supersede /usr/lib for AC_CHECK_LIB ?

2004-08-19 Thread Stan Guillory
Actually, on Solaris at least, LD_LIBRARY_PATH *is* used to find shared libraries to link against. It's been something we have particularly had to guard against, since some older versions of thirdparty libraries we use have been installed in /usr/lib and it has corrupted our builds. In fact, LD