In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
> On May 8, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Sokolov) wrote:
>
> > Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It is currently believed that every system has at least *some*
> >> shell implementation that supports functions [...]
>
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
> Thanks for the feedback. But I am still suspicious. There are way
> too many myths around Autoconf, and I'm willing to believe what I see.
> Have you really tried?
Yes. 4.3BSD and its immediate descendants were my primary development
platform
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rosoft.com>you write:
>
> At this point we have the following situation:
> The current makefile/configure combination doesn't
> work on systems without symbolic links because of
> the nested quoting problem discussed in this thread.
>
> No one has ye
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
> Mo McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, what I find more amusing is the fact that BSD is a free
> > replacement for UNIX. Which is exactly what the GNU project aims for,
> > albeit with different licensing terms. I fail to see
