2.52g: config.log and --with args

2001-11-12 Thread Jeff Squyres
quoted. otherflag, however, was only a single token, and was therefore not quoted. Can this kind of behavior be added to 2.52g? Thanks. {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness {+} "I came to ND for 4 years and ended up staying for a decade"

2.52g: config.log and --with args

2001-12-07 Thread Jeff Squyres
Greetings. I sent a message to this list about a month ago about what appears to be a bug in autoconf 2.52g and got no responses. Can someone look this over and make any suggestions? Many thanks. {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter

Disable the present-but-cannot-be-compiled header warning?

2008-10-29 Thread Jeff Squyres
- ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/ ## configure: WARNING: ## ------ ## Thanks! -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems _

Re: Disable the present-but-cannot-be-compiled header warning?

2008-10-29 Thread Jeff Squyres
me it happens: You should use four-arguments AC_CHECK_HEADERS. Pass AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT as the fourth argument if you want to filter out headers that cannot be compiled; pass [-] if you don't want that. That is perfect -- thanks! -- Jeff Squyres Cis

Re: Disable the present-but-cannot-be-compiled header warning?

2008-10-31 Thread Jeff Squyres
der (and the features that it provides) - when compiling on this platform with this compiler, we just want HAVE_INFINIBAND_DRIVER_H not defined, so that our C code can react accordingly In short: all we want is a simple "no" result from the test. Do

Re: Disable the present-but-cannot-be-compiled header warning?

2008-10-31 Thread Jeff Squyres
header as present). I used [AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT]. This gave me: - no warning - use the compiler check - test came back "no" - hence HAVE__H was not set Which is exactly what I wanted. -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ Autoconf mailing l

Re: Suggestion for command line parsing

2008-11-04 Thread Jeff Squyres
/gitweb/?p=autoconf.git;a=commitdiff;h=66b800 I'm applying this (it has the benefit of reducing the number of forks): Excellent -- thanks Eric! -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/ma

Suggestion for command line parsing

2008-11-04 Thread Jeff Squyres
the current environment). Here's a simple addition to the above code that will kick out the ==foo=bar case, although someone smarter than me with expr can probably come up with something better: ----- if test -z "$ac_envvar"; then $as_echo "$as_me: error: inval

SRPMs and RHEL 5/6 and SLES 11

2010-11-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
not a good / general solution. I've tried to ask some assistance from Red Hat but I haven't been able to get a response. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to solve this issue? I would find it hard to believe that we're the only package running into this issue. Thanks! --

Re: SRPMs and RHEL 5/6 and SLES 11

2010-11-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
Hence: yes, it's our problem. Not Autoconf's. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction, and sorry for the noise. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: Mac OS X Leopard and conftest.dSYM directories

2007-11-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
en -O0) to the Leopard built-in gcc will result in one of these .dSYM directories: # Just to be sure... $ rm -rf *.dSYM $ cat > mytest.c < Hello there, Jeff Squyres reported that on Mac OS X Leopard, some configure tests create spurious warnings of the form: rm: conftest.dSYM: is a dir

PACKAGE_FOO macros

2002-10-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
pace for preprocessor macros, the only way to segregate them is by different prefixes. But autoconf isn't even giving the user the option to do that -- these macros will be named PACKAGE_FOO, regardless of what the user wants. Please please please give us a way to turn off (or put a prefix in f

Re: PACKAGE_FOO macros

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Squyres
f this burden? Again -- the automake maintainers have seen the wisdom of not forcing their own #defines upon program authors (i.e., the "no-define" option). Can't autoconf do the same? {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University {+} http://www.osl.iu.edu/

Re: configuring sub directories optional

2002-10-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
for AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS because it wouldn't let my [optional] subdirectory configure's fail gracefully. It would be highly preferable if there was some kind of way of knowing whether the sub-configure failed, and then allowing the top-level configure.ac to decide whether to continue or not. {+

Re: configuring sub directories optional

2002-10-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
efore the top-level configure.ac) will immediately abort if any of the sub-configures return anything other than a status of 0. So there's no possibility of the top-level configure.ac checking to see if the sub-configure succeeded or not -- if the sub-configure fails, everything aborts. {+} Jeff Squy

Re: configuring sub directories optional

2002-10-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
s and fail cleanly without having to configure themselves in a "pass through" mode. I hope that makes sense. :-) {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University {+} http://www.osl.iu.edu/

Re: configuring sub directories optional

2002-10-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
ed for a specific platform. {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University {+} http://www.osl.iu.edu/

Re: Question on design of a C++ library w.r.t. config.h contents

2002-11-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
em is if the users also use autotools, the PACKAGE, > VERSION, etc. symbols collide, and the current version of g++3.2 I agree. The programmer should be given the option to turn off the PACKAGE/VERSION macros. Automake provides similar functionality -- autoconf should, too. -- {+} Jeff Squ

Re: AC_DEFINE questions

2002-12-12 Thread Jeff Squyres
y can't we use the same mechanisms instead of having to roll our own? AC_CREATE_PREFIX_CONFIG_H is not an option for me. -- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University {+} http://www.osl.iu.edu/

Re: AC_DEFINE questions

2002-12-12 Thread Jeff Squyres
post this stuff here because it's the autoconf list, and there is where I assume that suggestions and comments should be directed. - My original posts: http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/autoconf/2002-October/014384.html http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/autoconf/2002-October/014387.html -- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University {+} http://www.osl.iu.edu/

Re: AC_DEFINE questions

2002-12-18 Thread Jeff Squyres
configurations and "ways of doing things" out there, many of which will necessarily be totally different from each other. In my organization, the IT support staff is responsible for *all* software exept that which is being developed. I can't change that. -- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EM

Re: AC_DEFINE questions

2002-12-20 Thread Jeff Squyres
ation. This is actually the central issue. I made the above remark because someone made the suggestion / implication that all of my developers could each have their own installation, and that would avoid the "central IT support" problem. -- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Rese

Re: AC_DEFINE questions

2002-12-20 Thread Jeff Squyres
you could certainly *benefit* from them, even if you do not *need* them). -- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University {+} http://www.osl.iu.edu/