newbie - autoscan for f90

nks, Have a great evening! Cheers, Eve-Marie -- Eve-Marie Devaliere, MS Senior Science System/Software Engineer Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA) Phone: (301) 763-8172 Fax: (301) 763-8149 Address: World Weather Building Room #808 5200 Auth Rd Camp S

produce *mod with fortran

odules? I tried those macro too AC_PROG_FC_C_O AC_FC_MAIN in my configure.ac to try telling it it didn't have a main (I just want modules), but no luck (Please bear with me as I am new to Fortran too... ) Can anyone shed some light on the situation? Thanks a lot, Cheers, Eve-Marie -- Eve-

Re: produce *mod with fortran

error: cannot run Fortran compiled programs. This is very strange... I tried to reset FC to ifort to make sure but no luck If I export FCFLAGS again with -g ; (it configures again but make doesn't work) Eve-Marie Devaliere said the following on 1/14/2011 11:32 AM: > Good mor

Re: produce *mod with fortran

rie Paul Eggert said the following on 1/14/2011 1:18 PM: > On 01/14/11 09:23, Eve-Marie Devaliere wrote: >> checking whether the Fortran compiler works... configure: error: cannot >> run Fortran compiled programs. > Please check the output log: it should have a copy of the program

Re: produce *mod with fortran

:29 PM: > * Eve-Marie Devaliere wrote on Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:07:47PM CET: >> well it is looking for b.out >> --- >> configure:1840: $? = 0 >> configure:1854: checking for Fortran compiler default output file name >> configure:1857: ifort -c -O2 -convert big

Re: produce *mod with fortran

then of course make doesn't Any insights would be greatly appreciated, Have a great week-end, Thanks, Cheers, Eve-Marie Ralf Wildenhues said the following on 1/14/2011 2:13 PM: > Hello Eve-Marie, > > addressing the remaining part of your question: > > * Eve-Marie Devaliere

Re: produce *mod with fortran

DO I understand that correctly? Is there a way to go around that? Thanks again so much for your support! You are the men! :) Cheers, Eve-Marie Christopher Hulbert said the following on 1/15/2011 8:28 AM: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Eve-Marie Devaliere > wrote: >> Hello

make test

..) Thanks a lot, Cheers, Eve-Marie -- Eve-Marie Devaliere, MS Senior Science System/Software Engineer Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA) Phone: (301) 763-8172 x215 Fax: (301) 763-8149 Address: World Weather Building Room #808 5200 Auth Rd Camp Springs,

Re: make test

Thanks Frank and Eric for the prompt replies! > Autoconf includes the 'autotest' language, which parses a new file > tests.at to build up a (shell script) testsuite; as well as > documentation for a couple of hooks to add in configure.ac and your > Makefile to run such a testsuite. Such tests nee

Re: make test with fortran programs

time? Thanks a lot, Cheers, Eve-Marie Ralf Wildenhues said the following on 1/26/2011 2:45 PM: > Hello Eve-Marie, > > * Eve-Marie Devaliere wrote on Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 05:39:35PM CET: >>> http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#Tests >> Yes, Frank poi

Re: make test with fortran programs

hough .. :) ) Ralf Wildenhues said the following on 1/27/2011 12:31 PM: > Hello, > > * Eve-Marie Devaliere wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:02:33PM CET: >> TESTS = test/forward/Example1_Simple/Example1_Simple.f90 \ >> test/k_matrix/Example1_Simple/Example1_Simple.f90 &g

flags for different fortran compilers

ut I wanted to see if there wouldn't be a more elegant way... I am new to fortran too so that may sound crazy but couldn't there be a library of flag for known fortran compiler that autoconf could select on the fly like for the free form one? Thanks, Cheers, Eve-Marie -- Eve-Marie Devalie

Re: produce *mod with fortran

Thanks Ralph! I am now trying to make my package more portable so I am working on the part below > Do you need the package to be very portable? If so, I suggest you go to > the Autoconf Macro Archive and grab two Fortran-related macros, > AX_F90_MODULE_EXTENSION and AX_F90_MODULE_FLAG. > > We the

Re: produce *mod with fortran

Thanks Chris, you were right on it. I had downloaded it from sourceforge but yes it was apparently an older file Thanks, Cheers, Eve-Marie Christopher Hulbert said the following on 1/31/2011 12:40 PM: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Eve-Marie Devaliere > wrote: >> Thanks

Re: flags for different fortran compilers

Thanks Ralph. > > Which kinds of flags do you need support for? lots... :( For example, in their original make.macros they had # Compiler settings for DEBUG builds LINUX_COMMON_FLAGS_GFORTRAN_DEBUG = -pg LINUX_FLAGS_GFORTRAN_DEBUG = "FC_FLAGS= -c \

Re: produce *mod with fortran

oops I think I spoke a little too fast. autoconf was not giving me errors anymore but configure is still not happy first of all even with my AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) in configure.ac (before macro calls) and ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS= -I m4 in Makefile.am (top one) , I still need to run aclocal wit

Re: flags for different fortran compilers

Thanks Ralph (again :) ) > Well, we've already clarified that you should drop -c. yes , my bad, I just copied what they had in the rules.macros file > For any gfortran-specific flag that there is no good macro for, you can > start off by wrapping it in this if clause: > > if test $ac_cv_fc_compile

Re: produce *mod with fortran

Thanks again and again Ralph... well I am at a lost with what happened... I wasn't running autoreconf but diligently (or badly ? :) )typing the whole set of : libtoolize, aclocal -I m4, autoconf, automake I changed the else to what you suggested, ran autoreconf and it worked when running confi

Re: flags for different fortran compilers

>> In their original setup, they had support for the following compilers: >> xlf95, f95, f90 (SGI IRIX64 MIPSpro, Absoft and HP-UX), gfortran, >> ifort, pgf95, lf95, g95. > Well, maybe you can then fill the table below of possible flags, and > we can try writing macros for them. Oh that would b