Question on older version of gettext

2009-02-15 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
ng to a more recent gettext version? Thank you very much for looking into this, take care Dieter Jurzitza -- --- | \ /\_

Re: Question on older version of gettext

2009-02-15 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
e to patch the results of reautoconf afterwards. Any further suggestions are highly appreciated, thank you for your time, take care Diete

Re: Question on older version of gettext

2009-02-16 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
;make install". This will remove all warnings - but at a decent effort. I wanted it, I got it :-). As I said: just for the records .. And, no, I really do not want to update gettext. :-))) Thanks again for helping, take care Diete

Question on check-process / autoconf-2.6.3

2009-12-28 Thread Dr. Ing. Dieter Jurzitza
? Many thanks for helping in advance, take care Dieter Jurzitza -- --- | \ /\_/\ | | ~x

Re: Question on check-process / autoconf-2.6.3

2009-12-29 Thread Dr. Ing. Dieter Jurzitza
Dear Eric, for the begin: you're right, I am not attempting to build 2.6.3 but 2.63 instead, this was just a typo. Thank you very much for your hint, so I called make check TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v 27', the output of this command does not lead me really further, hence I attach what is significant duri

Re: Question on check-process / autoconf-2.6.3

2009-12-31 Thread Dr. Ing. Dieter Jurzitza
with using packages instead of the original source tarball, but this one is fixed now. Thank you very much for your help, sorry for the noise as this was not really autoconf related. A happy New Year to everyone on the list, take care Dieter Jurzitza Am Mittwoch 30 Dezember 2009 22:50:24

Re: Question on check-process / autoconf-2.6.3

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. Ing. Dieter Jurzitza
Hi folks, thank you for the honor, but this feedback of mine isn't even worth mentioning - so keep me out of the log, the work has been done by someone else. And be assured that it is of no importance whether you denote the "Dr" or don't if you still think my "contribution" is worth mentioning