F9X support

es or documentation. Thanks, -- Bil Kleb NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, USA

Fortran 90 support

. At this point I am only looking for very rudimentary capabilities such as finding compilers (especially on GNU/Linux machines) and and the presence/location of message passing libraries such as MPI. Thanks, -- Bil Kleb NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, USA

Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released

Akim Demaille wrote: > > This is also a call for people ready to: > > - improve the documentation Speaking of which, I tried a "make pdf" in the doc directory on my i686 Linux box and it failed with: texi2dvi --pdf --batch ./autoconf.texi This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159-14h-released-20010417

Re: Autoconf 2.53 is released

' make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/local/md/d4/local/pkgs/autoconf-2.53/bin' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 and cd doc ; make pdf reports errors about undefined control sequences, e.g., (autoconf.toc ! Undefined control sequence. l.180 \appendixentry Regards, -- Bil Kleb NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, USA

Re: ping: Fortran 9x support in 2003?

Paul Eggert wrote: > I'd say that the Fortran patches are right up there. I really like the sound of that... -- Bil Kleb NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, USA

configure complaint from a SGI O3k machine

given no checking whether cc -E accepts -o... yes [..] I'll forward more detailed information to anyone who wants to take a more detailed look... [This is during a configure for installing Ruby, http://www.ruby-lang.org/.] Regards, -- Bil Kleb NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, USA

Re: ping: updating Fortran support for f9x?

Steven G. Johnson wrote: Is there any chance that you could bang on my Fortran 9x patches this summer? See: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2002-11/msg9.html FWIW, I strongly second getting the Fortran 9x patches into the mainline... -- Bil Kleb, NASA, Hampton, Virginia