Re: State and plans for C++20 module support?

2025-02-18 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 16:32 -0500, Zack Weinberg wrote: > 2) Besides an "is this feature available" probe, I don't know if any >    support for C++ 2020 modules is even *necessary*, because I don't >    know how they work.  If any other changes are necessary, they would >    probably need to happen

Re: State and plans for C++20 module support?

2025-02-18 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 8:39 AM, Christoph Grüninger via Discussion list for the autoconf build system wrote: > Dear Autoconf, > > I am interested in the state and plans for supporting C++20 modules. As far as I know, nobody is currently working on anything related to C++ 2020 in either Autoconf

Re: State and plans for C++20 module support?

2025-02-18 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2/18/25 13:32, Zack Weinberg wrote: Autoconf includes logic to probe for various compiler features and for adequate support for various levels of the C and C++ standards. These probes have a bunch of problems and they currently don't include anything newer than about 2017 for eithe

State and plans for C++20 module support?

2025-02-18 Thread Christoph Grüninger via Discussion list for the autoconf build system
Dear Autoconf, I am interested in the state and plans for supporting C++20 modules. 1) Is there already support for C++20 modules in GNU Autotools? 2) Am I right that Autoconf would be the right place to implement support for C++20 modules? Or would another tool in the GNU Autotools stack be