Hi Brooks,
> On 29. Jul 2024, at 23:42, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> I wonder if AIX builds are producing SPEC1170-requesting programs
> most of the time, but not when building the autoconf code fragments?
> Otherwise I'd expect things to be failing more.
Thanks for the nudge in the right direction!
Hi Christoph.
Some hints about your draft application:
> > Where is your open source technology project being used (describe
> > all user bases)?
>
> GNU Autoconf and GNU Automake are part of the GNU Autotools, also known
> as the GNU Build System. The help making source code packages portable
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024, at 7:56 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> So it appears to be not as trivial as “mmap on AIX has been broken for
> ages”, but rather it seems that up to some version of AIX (4-5?), it
> used to require unmapping the address first. After that IBM still kept
> it as the default behav
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024, at 9:56 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> For all contributions, they have to be checked, commented and later
> committed by the few busy people with commit rights.
Because of this ...
> We need a list of "todo projects", similar to what is available for
> projects, who apply f
Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024, at 7:56 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
>> So it appears to be not as trivial as “mmap on AIX has been broken for
>> ages”, but rather it seems that up to some version of AIX (4-5?), it
>> used to require unmapping the address first. After that IBM still kept
"Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote:
> ...
> bash-5.1$ gcc mmap-full.c
> bash-5.1$ export XPG_SUS_ENV=ON
> bash-5.1$ ./a.out
> bash-5.1$ echo $?
> 0
> bash-5.1$ unset XPG_SUS_ENV
> bash-5.1$ ./a.out
> bash-5.1$ echo $?
> 10
>
> ... all controlled by a variable at runtime
> ... nothing one can do at
Hi Detlef - I think Christoph has already submitted the application to
the fund, in somewhat different form than the one you commented
on. There are some subsequent msgs between he and I on the list. (In
short, I basically agree[d] with all your comments. We probably didn't
get everything right fo
On 2024-07-31 11:05, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I'd like to ask everyone who reads this message to run
the test program on operating systems not listed above, and on older
versions of operating systems that*are* listed above.
I just now tried running it on CheriBSD Morello (cfarm240.cfarm.net) and
M
[trimming CC]
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024, Zack Weinberg wrote:
[snip]
> note: using 4096 bytes as page size.
> note: define MMAP_PROBE_PAGESIZE if this is incorrect.
> test: zero-fill after EOF (shared mapping)... ok
> test: zero-fill after EOF (private mapping)... ok
> test: writes visible via shared ma
Hi Perry,
> On 1. Aug 2024, at 00:39, Perry Hutchison wrote:
>
> One could, at build time, include code to do something like (untested):
>
> if (strcmp(getenv("XPG_SUS_ENV", "ON")) != 0)
> {
>setenv("XPG_SUS_ENV", "ON", 1);
> }
>
> (and yes, if AIX has already tested XPG_SUS_ENV before
Hi Zack,
> On 31. Jul 2024, at 20:05, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> Thanks for digging into this, Yury. I have access to AIX machines via
> the GCC compile farm but I would not have been able to find this.
I’m also using the compile farm thanks to the great peoples of GCC who maintain
and provide
11 matches
Mail list logo
