Paul Eggert wrote:
> OK, attached is a revised Gnulib proposed patchset that does that.
Looks all good to me. Great work, Paul!
I'm starting portability tests of it now...
Bruno
On Samstag, 10. September 2022 06:43:06 CEST Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 9/9/22 04:14, Bruno Haible wrote:
> >I would suggest to keep*one* module, and keep it named 'stdbool'.
> >Its meaning will be "provide bool, true, false according to the
> > standards".
> >It can invoke AC_HEADER_STD
Thanks for catching that doc bug. I installed into Gnulib the stdbool
patches with a fix for that, and also with one small change to
tests/test-stdbool.c so that it depends on HAVE_C_BOOL instead of
__STDC_VERSION__.
After we have more experience with this in Gnulib, we can start thinking
abo
> I'm starting portability tests of it now...
Result of portability testing: All is fine (no compilation error) on
- glibc (Ubuntu 22.04, Debian 11.1, CentOS 7)
- musl libc
- GNU/Hurd
- macOS
- FreeBSD 11, 13.1
- NetBSD 9.0
- OpenBSD 7.0
- AIX xlc and xlclang
- Solaris 10
- Sol
